[cryptome] Re: State Hash (see SPHINCS: practical stateless hash-based signatures)
- From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, cpunks <cypherpunks@xxxxxxxxxx>, djb <djb@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:07:54 -0700
On 10/8/14, Aftermath <aftermath.thegreat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> english is such a funny language
perhaps the best language to be funny, ;P
strong post-quantum signatures certainly celestial; a bit big, but hey...
head of class! avoids NTRU concerns. still no NTRU-Prime. i suppose if
i pester djb for minimal privacy by default (httpS://*..cr.yp.to/) i
can't also beg for post-quantum schemes and NEON acceleration for all
ciphers and signatures. *grin*
best regards,
Other related posts:
- » [cryptome] Re: State Hash (see SPHINCS: practical stateless hash-based signatures) - coderman
