[cryptome] Re: See??? Satoshi Nakamoto Smeared

  • From: Brendan Desmond <brendes@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:58:55 -0500

Here's hoping that folks ridicule this "journalism" for what it is
and some kind of backlash erupts. Here's hoping some kind of
anti-MSM tipping point boils over.
Thank you John and all for the information you have provided over the
years. It shall be interesting to see what happens next, to say the
least.

All the best,

A quiet science student somewhere in New England.

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:01:06AM -0500, John Young wrote:
http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html


Leah McGrath Goodman


@truth_eater

What a piece of shit reporting. Journalists compulsively play
pop psychologist is reporting on targets to obscure their
lack of technical capability. When ridiculed for this they
say readers want the gossip because they too lack technical
comprehension.

Not a single journalist resists the temptation for slimey personal
analysis to boost sales from Obama to Putin to Satoshi, from
NY Times to Guardian to WaPo to Wired to The Intercept.

Still the tech firms suck up to the ignorant outlets for lurid
coverage, crypto firms now leading the pack to promote
comsec panic for digital cash-in. You, once honorably corrupt,
dear cpunks, should be raking it in as if in compelled to
rationalize cryptoligarchy.

Fuck them dead, the whipsawing comsec windfall bandits.




At 09:05 AM 3/6/2014, you wrote:
I *told* you I wasn't Satoshi.

;-)

Poor bastard...

Cheers,
RAH



Other related posts: