[cryptome] Re: San Bernardin Massacre: Conspiracy Charges: Enrique Marquez Jr.

  • From: Michael Shelton <iao.ms88@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:36:15 -1000

Dear Sir,
A very interesting and astute
analysis of a horrifying incident.
Looking at the time line of events as you lay it out,tells a much
different story than the
Mainstream media does.
Being better informed is
essential to people understanding events like this.
Censorship can be carried out just by omitting part of the
Story, with all the TLAs doing
their jobs (questionable in even
the best circumstances, in a case like this a cover-up is par
for the course.)it would seem
Like more answers would fit
the case,but when those answers are tailored to protect
negligence or intelligence sources,there really isn't much
left to go on.
I was honestly surprised that the 3rd conspirator was found
and charged,but usually it would be years after determination of the
I am reminded of the classic
Quote from " Dragnet";
"Just the facts,ma'am."
Respectfully submitted,
On 19 Dec 2015 08:54, "doug" <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

see url:
For court papers./affadavit; see url:

it is interesting to note that at the beginning of the affadavit, the date
of the start of the investigation into Marquez by Joel T. Anderson, special
agent of the FBI goes back at least before July 17th 2015! The charges
of conspiracy against Marques and which would have included Farook, had he
been caught alive, go back to 2009 and 2011. The alleged planning for a
terrorist attack of some kind goes back to 2011, though it appears that
Farook left ouut Marquez, leaving him to take some of the blame. Guns were
purchased in the name of Marquez and handed over to Farook, the assassin.
The reason for choosing the site of the attack was not because it was of
some relevance to the politics or religion of Islam or the people present
at the site, but because it was a place Farook knew well and was therefore
convenient and easy for him to carry out a massacre of the greatest
numbers. The victims weren't discriminated against because of their age,
sex, ethnic origins, jobs or occupations or political inclinations. In
other words, the two terrorists had absolutely no compassion or concern for
whom they killed or injured or terrorised. The woman terrorist took her
baby to a baby-sitter, just before the attack.

One has to contrast this of course with the non-judicial executions
carried out by state actors via drones and armed expeditions on foreign
citizens in alien countries. Far more innocent victims have been killed by
US, Uk and other Western governments in the name of killing terrorists over
the years. This is not to excuse or somehow justifiy Farook and his wife's
action against the people of San Bernadino. It just shows, in my view,
where violence leads to in the end, whether the perpetrators are state
actors acting illegally or terrorists. Both kinds of action are
self-defeating and lead to revenge and retribution of some kind.
Democracy, Christianity and freedom are supposed to be the highest and most
supreme form of government, with the U.S. and the U.K. leading the
liberation of the peoples of the world, saving them from Islaamic or any
other extremism, which is opposed to western values; by showing them by
example how the international and national affairs of the world should be

Other related posts: