[cryptome] Roark v NSA: Plaintiffs Motion to Unseal Documents

  • From: "Douglas Rankine" <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:41:42 -0000

See url: http://cryptome.org/2015/03/roark-107.pdf 


The gloves are off.  Diane Roark has exceeded her previous performances.
What a woman, what learning...a brilliant exposition of her case.  She is
asking for a return of all of her property from illegal searches, and that
such documents aren't classified and classified documents are not to be
classified because they are an embarrassment or to hide criminality.   


General Warrant searches are all the rage in the US and the UK at the
moment.  We got to stop those terrorists and if a few informers, journalists
and whistleblowers get caught in the dragnet for revealing official
corruption or incompetence...during a illegal search or with a general what
the hell... J.  


Quoting Seymane's case too.  An Englishman's home is his castle.  One of
England's oldest cases on constitutional law, protecting the individual from
arbitrary search and possession of one's property or person.


Well worth a read by all of those folks with an interest in constitutional
law and freedom of speech.


See url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semayne%27s_case



And url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wilkes


Wilkes & Liberty.  For an interesting journey down the Englishman's home is
his castle route, with visits to the Hellfire Club by the establishment at
the time.



Other related posts:

  • » [cryptome] Roark v NSA: Plaintiffs Motion to Unseal Documents - Douglas Rankine