Under US Law..Two wrongs can make a right then... :-).
I thought that the judge's decision was very concise and very clear. Got rid
of all the garbage and clutter around the question. It was a nice touch for
the NSA to use a low ranking person for the finale...just to rub salt in the
wound. She may, of course, appeal, but that costs and I think the result is
pretty clear. At least she must be congratulated for trying, and we have all
learned a lot from her experiences.
What is "bigsun project"...pray?
ATB.
Dougi
-----Original Message-----
From: cryptome-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cryptome-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of coderman
Sent: 05 May 2015 07:21
To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cryptome] Re: Roark V USA: Reply by Government asking court to refuse
to unseal documents
On 4/7/15, Douglas Rankine <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Even if the search of Diane Roark's premises was unlawful. The
government has the right to retain any documents seized which are
classified or belong to the government, is the main contention being
made by the US government
