This is a non-story.All world leaders, because they engage in various kinds of deception and not transparency, should expect to be spied upon and have their communications intercepted. Do they think the Panopticon should only be focused on the targets they select. Me thinks they protest too much.
Gary Wallin On 10/27/2013 6:16 AM, John Young wrote:
Hard to believe the DE spies did not know of spying on Merkel perhaps assisted it as part of their own spying on her, then pretended ignorance when "given evidence," then had to pretend to alert her to what she already knew about her and the German spies spying on Obama and other leaders, and Merkel then had to call Obama, who then the two had to pretend ignorance and laughed in complicity, then NSA had to pretend they do not spy on Obama as well as quite a bit about working with other spies doing the same because elected officials are fickle, ambitious, and not to be trusted, and then that applies to the citizenry, other spies and angels in the sky with diamonds on their shoes ... An analyis is Merkel's phone-security, pretty much like Obama's and other leaders, us and ... http://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2013/10/how-secure-is-merkel-phone.html<http://electrospaces.blogspot.nl/2013/10/how-secure-is-merkel-phone.html>
-- All my email is subject to viewing by the Panopticon :: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon :: Except in the imaginations of the netizens there is no real secrecy or privacy on the Internets. The powers that be have been elevated to lofty positions of near omnipresence. Enjoy, adapt, and survive.