[cryptome] LINX Management support for Gagging order rejected by members

  • From: "douglas rankine" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "douglasrankine" for DMARC)
  • To: Cryptome Mailing List <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 02:12:46 +0000

Further information on the LINX rejection of the special resolution and why it is important...

see url: http://www.revk.uk/2017/02/snoopers-charter-and-linx.html



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [cryptome] LINX Management support for Gagging order rejected by members
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:53:26 +0000
From: douglas rankine (Redacted sender douglasrankine for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:       cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To:     Cryptome Mailing List <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



see url:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/22/linx_members_vote_to_block/

The naughty boys must be the Management of LINX and not Duncan Campbell
and The Register after all...

Why would the management of LINX want to vote to bind themselves with a
gagging order brief?  Aren't they democratic capitalists then?  Can't
they see the dangers for the money and their greedy silence?  Talk about
hypocricy....:-).

ATB

Dougie.



Other related posts: