[cryptome] Klayman v Clintons: Alleged Criminal Conspiracy and Racketeering

  • From: "Douglas Rankine" <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:05:42 +0100

http://cryptome.org/2015/03/klayman-v-clintons-pb-post-15-0326.pdf



This is a case about the Clintons hiding behind a charity they own, whose
computers were allegedly used as servers to send state emails, so as to
avoid scrutiny under the Freedom of the Information Act. Accusations are
being made under the RICO or racketeering act. The case is, some may say,
conveniently surfacing not long before the US Presidential elections. One
could surmise that its aim is to discredit Hilary Clinton, to the point
where she does not stand, or does not win the nomination for the Democratic
Party, or does not win the Presidential election. I dare say that there
will be one coming along soon on Zeb Bush, who is also rumoured to be
standing for President, on behalf of the Republican Party.





After briefly looking at this case. I wondered who Larry Klayman was, so I
looked him up on Goggle.

Here is what I found see url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Klayman



Now, do I waste my time trawling through the case or do I forget it...Will I
gain a valuable insight on the Clintons, their levels of security awareness,
and their attempts to hide what they have been up to? According to many of
the entries, the man appears to be somewhat of a publicity seeker...he has
lost many cases and even been barred from conducting cases in some courts.
He also has political views of an extreme kind; and an outlook on tea
parties with which I do not concur, having suffered the indirect
consequences of the one that was held all those years ago...something to do
with "No taxation without representation".... and led to the diminishment of
the British Colonial Empire.



However, on the benefit side, he has drawn considerable attention not only
to himself, and not always in the best of lights, or for the right reasons,
but which have also revealed stuff which was either not known or at least
widely known...and court cases can be so interesting for what they reveal
and often lead one to explore different associations, links and
routes....Decisions, decisions, decisions....



We already know of course that Hilary Clinton as US Foreign Secretary wanted
all of the freedom fighters, liberationists, revolutionaries, and
dissidents of the world to use certain free specialist software designed,
manufactured, and distributed by various agencies and departments and
companies contracted to the US government, so that they could subvert their
own and those governments which the US did not like, with security, safety
and anonymity....The question is though, whether Hilary knew that the
antidote to the same software was being sold to the intelligence services of
those very states abroad by the same agencies, departments and companies for
profit...is another matter.

ATB

Dougie.

P.S. I do remember that when Richard Nixon was standing for election as
President way back whenever it was a campaign slogan which popped up its
ugly head was..." You can't lick our Dick"...only to be withdrawn when
someone important discovered that it had other meanings and
connotations...C'est la vie...

Other related posts: