[cryptome] Re: Interesting

  • From: Peter Presland <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 07:53:34 +0100

On 24/08/2013 22:03, militarywritersassociation@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The video is old footage from the Iraq war....let the disinformation war 
> begin.....

... with the Military Writers association and one or two other here
among its legions of gullible pawns it seems - if this thread so far is
anything to go by.

The 'disinformation war' as you call it, on all things connected to
US/Western foreign policy matters in general, and in furtherance of
Eretz Yisrael in particular, has been a permanent fixture from their
beginnings - aka the Mossad 'By way of deception....' etc etc. It just
waxes and wanes like the phases of the moon according to the need for
this or that casus belli, that's all. We appear to be approaching yet
another full moon with these latest Syrian allegations - no matter their
utter absurdity when measured against rational criteria, viz:

1. For the past few months (since the debunking of the last CW
allegations in fact), Assad government forces have been trouncing the
Gulf State imported Salafist cut-throats bringing 'Democracy to Syria',
as we are expected to believe

2. Assad knows better than anyone that CW use is a red line and the most
likely casus belli (contrived or otherwise) for Western intervention.
It's been a Western mantra for 6 months or more now.

Does anyone seriously believe that, on the day after UN weapons
inspectors arrive in Damascus - at Assad's invitation and specifically
to investigate previous CW allegations - his forces would launch a CW
attack just miles away? really?

Yesterday Obama said 'If Assad has used CW's then a red line has been
crossed' - Notice a glaring ommission there anyone? That's it. Why a red
line for Assad but nobody else?

The wonder to me is that intelligent people on this list - and in their
millions elsewhere, seem totally oblivious to all this - maybe they just
get a thrill out of the drums beating eh?

Other related posts: