[cryptome] Re: How reliable is this new Detekt?

  • From: Aftermath <aftermath.thegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:26:49 -0800

wouldnt be hard to find out.. just have a screen recorder running, then
download it twice then slow down

then playback of the video you just recorded

On Sunday, November 23, 2014, Shaun O'Connor <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>  hmmm  missed that one..probably a counter of some sort..funny how it
> whips past very quickly  as described though maybe no one is supposed to
> notice it. it would be an interesting experiment to find out if every
> download is preceded by the same sequence of digits or otherwise...could be
> a correlation counter.of course, i am guessing.. perhaps i am totally and
> utterly paranoid!!
>
> atb
> Shaun
> On 23/11/2014 18:56, In Harms Way wrote:
>
> Did anyone else realize that when you download detect.exe 
> fromhttps://github.com/botherder/detekt
> then just before the download resolves as detekt.exe very briefly a 10
> or so digit number appears and disappears.
>
> Is that just a download counter or an identifier?
>
> IHW
>
> John Young wrote, On 22/11/2014 18:50:
>
>  Dopplegangers, its Google which goppledangs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> * PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION *
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/when-time-comes-we-need-be-ready-fight-tpps-secret-anti-user-agenda
>

Other related posts: