> Hi Doug, > Thank you very much for the kind and honest reply. > A few lint-stuffed additions and questionably related babble: > 1. "do date" = "due date" > My bad. > 2. In a mid 1960s > episode of "Rocky & Bullwinkle", R & B were walking on the campus of > Whatsamata U. and asked a "hippie-looking" kid where everybody was going. > He answered, "We're going to the Student Union to protest Norman Mailer!" > > I will never ever forget that line. I was aware enough then to laugh, and > still laugh when it crawls back into mind. > > 3. And, for pure rambling fluff in closing, here is how I've become > passionate about the value of stewardship of citizen privacy and rI learned > to write FORTRAN in 7th grade in 1967 on an IBM 360. It was located at a bio > research facility. Data comm and physiological modeling became a hobby as fun > as hunting, fishing and trapping. And been into and applying it ever since. > Kinda nerd-giggly. And made a living from it. > > Still I'm not "a good programmer" by good programmer's standards, as far as > I'm concerned. But I learned and love the challenge to build the most > efficient (tightest security, most efficient performance-wise (and always > cheapest by far) result) systems design and implementation. How is simple. I > always brought/bring in help who are much smarter than me. > > Honestly, the approach has never saved LESS than $2MIL on medium scale > projects, over the Anderson's, Toilet and Douche, etcetera, bidders who > slithered in through Executive wine and dine attempts to derail valid > protests from our internal division and proven contractors. I've kicked them > out the door or resigned, first. And always I'm lucky to have been hired back > as soon as their merit/performance was obvious. > > When I teach my counterparts that "resigning" is a realistic option and > always works out in the end, it's always received like its the first time > they've heard or considered it. In japan and in the US. I've made more > mistakes than everyone I've met combined. But I try not to make the same ones > twice. I'm not smart by any measure. Just stubborn. > I've been very lucky. But uncompromising focus on > user/patient/citizen/needy-consumer privacy, cost containment, starting with > prototypes & results analysis and Plan B from inception, before all else, has > let me sleep at night. > > And for the life of me I don't know how the greedy cronies, NSA and the rest, > can sleep at all. Their intent is and always has been truly misguided and > harmful to all. > > I seen the price of incompetence, needless financial drain, and politicized > sales fairytales early on. They always, w/out exception, result in > domino-effect burdens on trusting consumers & taxpayers. They're one in the > same, and they always suffer and own the resulting burden. > > Thank you very much, yet again for your sincerity. I find myself far too > verbose in my posts here. Sorry. I need to really work on that! > Todd > > On Jul 5, 2014, at 5:32 AM, doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dear Todd, > There is no need to apologise, as far as I am concerned, ...