Sounds fair enough to me Doug, but with a minor caveat: based on your
postings here I am likely to have less time than you to devote to this,
so long considered replies may take a while.
Since the following links, originally posted in reply to Chien Fume,
approximate to my developing understanding more closely than do the
establishment official narratives and they are wide-ranging, I will open
with them for starters.
An example of the outrageous deceptions of the
Paula's take on her bother Adolf Hitler.
On 06/06/2016 13:40, douglas rankine (Redacted sender douglasrankine2001
for DMARC) wrote:
Dear Peter, So am I...Now, where would you like to start? Shall we open
a new thread and give it a name? If so, would you like to suggest one,
or me to suggest one? I can't speak for others on this list of course,
as to their behaviour, or replies, or knowledge of netiquette, but I
personally am willing to refrain from personal attacks. I may not agree
with your views, your beliefs or your opinions, or even your sources or
evidence, no more than you do mine..., though funnily enough there are
some things on which I agree with you, but I am prepared to discuss the
subject (whatever subject we decide) exchange ideas and evidence and
consider carefully what you are saying and what evidence you present to
back up your viewpoint. I am also willing to learn from you on points
where I may be misinformed, after all that is what a mailing list is all
about...in my view. By the same token I would expect similar treatment
in return. With kind regards, Dougie.
On 06/06/2016 08:17, Peter Presland wrote:
Again, only one side of this this is subject to 'confirmation bias'?
Really? I do not have 'beliefs' about Jews, irrational or otherwise';
I have evidence, on the balance of which I assign probabilities. It's
called research and the Hasbara doesn't like it, unless it is aimed at
furthering Victors' history narratives.
I am willing to debate this issue on the merits of the evidence. You
OTOH seem intent on preventing any such debate.