Wait, numbbutt whiners, there is gold in those duplicates, triplicates. Eugen's multiple posts are not identical. Best save them all for the quite valuable and revealing metadata which differs for each. That metadata's value usually exceeds the stupid bitchings rancid and senseless as oh so witty tweets. And responses from the various fora also differ and provide information and metadata which may be senselessly filtered, typical comsec arrogantly foot shooting and blinding to score points of utter insignificance except to metadata profiling of the gullbile whiners and tut-tutters and tutors. Peer closely: you will see that Eugen is working his ass off on behalf of metadata planters, siphoners and exploiters who designed and run all levels and permutations of open and secret Internet, doing damn fine pinging and backstabbing as high-level trained to do, to work in wolf packs against sheeps gamboling as if their herder was the absolutely incorruptible RISKS operator, planter, siphoner, exploiter, redesigner of an even more pernicious Internet gobbler. At 10:22 AM 10/19/2013, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:40:19PM +0200, Mob wrote: > Also, if you don't want to miss anything, you are probably > subscribing to the cypherpunks, cryptography@randombits, > cryptography@metzdowd and cryptopolitics (low volume at the moment) > lists, often receiving a hundred postings every day, or more. > Including doubles and triples reposted by Eugene Leitl. To scan I'm highly sympathetic to your plight, and suggest the following solution: install a procmail recipe to filterout dupes with the same message ID (e.g. <5261AAC3.6050102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>in case of the mail I'm replying to) and/or matching Resent-Message-ID: with leitl.org behind it. http://help.cs.umn.edu/email/procmail > these postings with the quick-browse/delete-method (3-4 posts a > second) is significantly, irritatingly slower if you have to wait > for the fractions of a second that the HTML needs to load.