On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Douglas Rankine < douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > > > Exploring the situation further. I have come to the following conclusions. > > > > First of all, I have decided that it is better to forget about the > security aspects of purchasing a new laptop, because it has become obvious > through the discussions on here that laptops with enhanced security > measures cost an awful lot more...almost 3 times the price for some of > them, yet there is no guarantee that they are any more secure, anonymous, > or private than any other laptop at a third of the price. Sticky tape is > the same price no matter what camera and microphone one has on ones > computer... J. It appears to me, from what you security guys have said > on here, that the NSA, CIA, 5 I’s Russian FSB, Chinese MSS and French > DGSE, even when the missus would, if she could, be using TOR, TAILS, PGP > and Bitcoin for secure and anonymous communications and transactions of any > kind, even if she were amenable are a waste of time and money, for the > standard of security she requires. From what I can see Uncle Tom Cobley’s > International Conglomerate Security Company et al. have got the whip hand, > and the international computer security protection industry is completely > fucked. > > > > Thank you for your contributions so far, they have been most illuminating, > and very positive; and I have taken some of your suggestions on board and > now realise that I have to refine my specifications, for the purchase on > the basis of best value for money, which fits in with me missus’s wants, > needs and desires. > > > > > > There are two aspects to the specifications. > > > > Personal Criteria > > 1. What me missus actually uses the computer for. > > 2. What physical criteria she requires in terms of size and > fashion, weight, and whether it will fit into her shoulder bag. > > 3. What functions the computer will deliver. > > 4. The speed and reliability of the computer. > > 5. The length of time the battery lasts before it needs recharging > > 6. The operating system she is comfortable with. > > 7. How well it will work in the dark or abroad, in a cafe, > aeroplane, train, ferry or car or McDonalds. > > 8. Value for money, the price compared with other, similar computers > > 9. A price between £300 and £500 (unless there is a laptop which > far surpasses with its spec...up to £600 max. > Depends on the size of the shoulder bag, honestly. For a smaller machine, I'd probably recommend a Lenovo X series... X61 is what my Missus carries. X220/X230 is a good machine - used to deploy them at a former employer. Pick one up with a docking station and a spare power adapter - the optical drive will be in the docking station. With an extended battery, she can get anywhere from 6-9 hours of battery life out of the system, and it's not huge (physically). Leave the docking station at home, throw a monitor, network cable, etc. on it and when she gets home, dock and go. They're reliable boxes, I've seen one that got (accidentally) pitched down the steps and only suffered a cracked screen - never stopped working. The X61 will run anything from XP to Windows 8, with aplomb. Memory is upgradable from 512 MB to 8 GB, I believe. Uses a standard 2.5" SATA drive - which means that you can put standard SSD in it. The ThinkPads generally either have a backlit keyboard (more modern models) or a light that shines down from the top of the monitor when it's open - makes working in the dark really nice. It's also very well documented - do a Google search for HMM X61 or HMM X220 for example. The X1 Carbon that I personally carry is thinner, but with a bigger screen. Has an SSD, backlit keyboard, 8 GB RAM, 3G onboard... but, the cost is a little more and it may not fit the size requirements. Another option might be the ThinkPad T series systems, but they can get pretty heavy - have all the same features, but also have an optical drive onboard. I did think about an SSD hard disk as I understand this makes a computer a > lot faster and energy efficient, > And physical damage resistant since there's no rotational media. > but they are very expensive, > Not on this side of the pond... but, I know you guys are VAT'd. > perhaps a combination of the two might be best...What do you think... > > Anything I have forgotten, or don’t know about, that you think might be > worth incorporating... J. > --- A