[cryptome] Re: FOIPA Glomar
- From: Jeremy Compton <J.Compton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:45:10 +0000
UNSUBSCRIBE
________________________________________
From: cryptome-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cryptome-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 21 January 2016 00:09
To: grarpamp
Cc: cpunks; cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cryptome] Re: FOIPA Glomar
On 1/20/16, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
Let FOIA do the work for you...
Annual count of all queries replied with "can neither confirm or deny /
etc".
aha! were it only this simple.
the dispositions noted in the response,
the disposition noted in MuckRock,
the disposition noted in their electronic filing system (if present),
and the disposition actually contained in the reply document,
may all be different!
this is actually at times a subtle fuck-off without allowing time for appeal.
an effective solution with robust annotations would require a
sustained, multi-year effort with a handful of experienced
invidivuals... you could learn, and participate? :)
more soon...
Other related posts:
