[cryptome] Re: FOIA Response to a request for #DF-2009-00108

  • From: Ryan Carboni <ryacko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 13:32:34 -0800

That's actually illegal for someone else to sign under another's name.

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:05 PM, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Not this sig. May be a contractor. We have received telephone
> calls from contractors working at CIA and State Dept to aid
> FOIA answers. Quite friendly, sound youngish, unlike the usual
> sour pusses who stonewall and insult by tyrannical decree.
>
> A few days later material appears as promised. Well, a little bit
> of it, far from all. A page or two, redacted, half-assed, inscrutible.
> Contractors as another barrier to access to innards of government
> despite the contractor having access.
>
> So youngish, friendly, is now part of official stonewalling and
> withholding as if outsourced to Bangladesh branches of
> unis indebting students.
>
> You will surmise this is the result of Edward Snowden outsourcing:
> youngish, friendly disclosure, a little bit, far from all. Another barrier
> to access to innards of government despite the contractor having
> access. Or so it is a little bit disclosed.
>
> At 05:43 PM 11/1/2014, you wrote:
>
> Can anyone quite make out the signature? The last word/name certainly
> doesn't seem to be Hudson, and previous signatures by Hudson available
> online (
> http://www.governmentattic.org/9docs/GrassleyCoburnODNI_2011-2012.pdf )
> have only three distinct names.
>
>

Other related posts: