[cryptome] Re: Edwards v Snowden: Citizen Four

  • From: "shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:04:40 -0800

On February 12, 2015 11:00:24 AM doug wrote:

The best way to rid oneself of temptation...is to give in to it...Oscar Wilde

Ah, yes...I could not agree more!

I tried grabbing it from Cryptome when it first went up but the download kept truncating, so off to the torrents I went. Quick and easy.

Speaking of quick and eaay, a side note: I just changed the email address on my subscription at the ecartis link, which involves a simple 'unsub' from the old address & subscribing with the new one. Easy and instantaneous. (You'd wondered if there was a self-serv option the last time I grumbled at someone to do it themselves ;) )

On 12/02/15 16:37, Aftermath wrote:
> magnet link for those who do not care about copyright.. 1080P rip:
> magnet:?xt=urn:btih:77e1a18941186c1e6441721df91183d2a339d103&dn=Citizenfour+EDWARD+SNOWDEN+%5B1080p%5D+%5B2014&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com
> <http://2Fopen.demonii.com>%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk
> <http://2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk>%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org > <http://2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org>%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com
> <http://2Fexodus.desync.com>%3A6969
> and of course, its also hosted on cryptome:
> http://cryptome.org/Citizenfour-HD.7z
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Shaun O'Connor
> <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>     I could not agree more and the government are even tying to claim
>     thy have "been more open about such matters" since the snowden
>     revelations, when all they have really done is regurgitated what
>     is already out there with a few little twists to make it appear
>     that they have been more forthcoming. the usual spin, trying to
>     deflect people from questioning their motives, trouble is so many
>     people just read what "the government" puts out nods wisely and
>     think "oh , must be true then cus the gov'ment says so", mustn't
>     question government must we. ohhh that would never do, we might be
>     called dissidents or sommut.
>     I shall definitely peruse that case material more deeply though Doug.
>     ATB
>     Shaun
>     On 12/02/2015 14:19, doug wrote:
>>     Hi Shaun,
>>     If you look at the  stuff from Clapper, since he took over as the
>>     Director of the CIA.  He is in denial about the torture, and
>>     almost everything else, just as much of the rest of the US ruling
>>     elites are.  (Obama says. "We tortured some people" and that is
>>     the end of it, no prosecutions, no holding to account...nuffink).
>>     It's a bit like the holocaust denial merchants. They are still
>>     arguing that it never really happened.  This case is about
>>     burying all of the Snowden era of revelations, making it
>>     difficult for future whistleblowers; but at the same time it is
>>     opening it all up.  The higher up the case goes, the more
>>     publicity, and the more people and organisations will be
>>     associated with it, or opposed to it.  Might just reach its apex
>>     at the time of the next US Presidential election.
>>     It is part of the political reaction to all those secret jewels
>>     being put on public display. Now, I am sure that Edwards doesn't
>>     really want that, but it is his choice after all.  That is why
>>     the case is important...Will he achieve his aims of suppression?
>>     I doubt it, but at least he is keeping the can of worms open, and
>>     the winning might come at great cost.  We never get any of this
>>     sort of thing in the UK.  The ruling elites have got the secrecy
>>     angle all well battened down, and the likes of Black Friday is
>>     much more interesting for the masses of people.  We now have an
>>     election period which covers 5 months instead of 3 weeks and it
>>     is all pretty repetitive and boring, yet have we heard a word
>>     about democratic rights and liberty?  No, but we have heard
>>     plenty of stuff about getting out of the European Court of Human
>>     Rights etc.
>>     ATB
>>     Dougie.
>>     On 12/02/15 13:37, Shaun O'Connor wrote:
>>>     A bit late for that!! The horse has already bolted from the
>>>     stable!!! and as for them seeking reparation for damage to
>>>     "national security" well if they are  prepared to play with dirt
>>>     they should expect to  get dirt on their hands.
>>>     Why on earth should they ask the courts to clean their dirty
>>>     linen for them AND expect the film makers to pay for the privilege.?
>>>     Rhetorical question of course but they are in my opinion
>>>     arrogant pigs to a fault.
>>>     ATB
>>>     Shaun
>>>     On 12/02/2015 12:31, doug wrote:
>>>>     Just to let you know....The Edwards court case is about getting
>>>>     the film banned and those who made it put in jail and the
>>>>     companies they work for shut down and made to pay reparations
>>>>     to the American state because they have damaged US national
>>>>     security and the whole fabric of American society for exposing
>>>>     all those nasty tricks and bits of tradecraft which are carried
>>>>     out in the name of diplomacy and foreign policy, by the
>>>>     democratic employees and leadership of that state.
>>>>     ATB
>>>>     Dougie.
>>>>     On 12/02/15 12:24, Shaun O'Connor wrote:
>>>>>     I have seen the movie, its interesting stuff, bang up to date
>>>>>     as well since it also includes the aftershock so to speak of
>>>>>     Snowdens revelations
>>>>>     As for Snowden providing new information.  I don't think he so
>>>>>     much  told us anything we didn't know but rather gave
>>>>>     substance and credence to what many in-the field had suspected
>>>>>     for quite some time. corroborative evidence if you will.
>>>>>     ATB
>>>>>     Shaun
>>>>>     On 12/02/2015 12:09, doug wrote:
>>>>>>     see url: http://cryptome.org/2015/02/edwards-010-014.pdf
>>>>>>     Case developing nicely...lots of information being revealed
>>>>>>     in a nice, logical, time line way.  A lot of information to
>>>>>>     read of course...111 pages of court documents.  Copy of
>>>>>>     Citizen Four freely submitted to judge for his/her perusal...
>>>>>>     The joys of service to the people.  Pity the film is
>>>>>>     copyrighted...I might have watched it...:-).
>>>>>>     Enjoy
>>>>>>     ATB
>>>>>>     Dougie.
>>>>>     --
>>>>> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/when-time-comes-we-need-be-ready-fight-tpps-secret-anti-user-agenda
>>>     --
>>> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/when-time-comes-we-need-be-ready-fight-tpps-secret-anti-user-agenda
>     --
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/when-time-comes-we-need-be-ready-fight-tpps-secret-anti-user-agenda

Other related posts: