[cryptome] Re: Diane Roark: Plaintiffs Reply

  • From: Ryan Carboni <ryacko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:55:38 -0800

Cleverness is not enough.

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Douglas Rankine <
douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> See url: http://cryptome.org/2015/02/roark-100-101.pdf
>
>
>
> I am really enjoying this case...though it is rather long and difficult to
> understand in bits.  She is very clever in some respects...and very, very
> determined that the NSA/FBI are not going to get away with all their
> illegal “surreptitious” searches and cover ups.  She has offered the NSA
> some cheap software which allows them to quickly find if any elements of a
> classified document is out there in the public domain.  The NSA has been
> unable to argue time or staff constraints because of this, and have had to
> say that they have sufficient resources to do this.  She is also providing
> a little booklet to help educate the judge in how to handle classified
> information in a court case, and is cleverly using previous case law and
> actions against her colleagues to show that the documents which she is
> asking for the return of, are in fact in the public domain.  The NSA, of
> course does not want to use such a piece of software, as it has its
> own...much better, more sophisticated and expensive equipment for tracking
> classified documents....Ha! Ha! Ha!.
>
> e.
>
> See url: http://cryptome.org/2014/12/peck-roark-affidavit.pdf
>
> For an explanation of how the software works...back to Dr. Watson and the
> gullibility factor...:-).
>
> Enjoy.
>
> ATB
>
> Dougie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: