[cryptome] Diane Roark: Plaintiffs Reply

  • From: "Douglas Rankine" <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:46:03 -0000

See url: http://cryptome.org/2015/02/roark-100-101.pdf


I am really enjoying this case...though it is rather long and difficult to
understand in bits.  She is very clever in some respects...and very, very
determined that the NSA/FBI are not going to get away with all their illegal
"surreptitious" searches and cover ups.  She has offered the NSA some cheap
software which allows them to quickly find if any elements of a classified
document is out there in the public domain.  The NSA has been unable to
argue time or staff constraints because of this, and have had to say that
they have sufficient resources to do this.  She is also providing a little
booklet to help educate the judge in how to handle classified information in
a court case, and is cleverly using previous case law and actions against
her colleagues to show that the documents which she is asking for the return
of, are in fact in the public domain.  The NSA, of course does not want to
use such a piece of software, as it has its own...much better, more
sophisticated and expensive equipment for tracking classified
documents....Ha! Ha! Ha!.


See url: http://cryptome.org/2014/12/peck-roark-affidavit.pdf

For an explanation of how the software works...back to Dr. Watson and the
gullibility factor...:-).







Other related posts: