Here is Cryptome's full set (so far) of post-admission replies. I'm unable
to make anything consistent out of it.
"Admission of leaked logs" is rather generously overstated of what we
specifically understated.
https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581186036989953
Me: You understated things? As in, left something(s) out??
Cryptome: Told what was needed to defuse your exaggeration and resist your
demands to auth visitors.
https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652585088912355328
Note that Cryptome doesn't dispute the email that I quoted, which was copy
and pasted in it's entirety.
Rigged and disinfo remain valid. You overstated the disclosure. Leaking is
press exaggeration.
https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652581918215684096
Nothing is ever deleted, that is subterfuge to escape culpability. You
ratted Cryptome visitors. Not the first or last.
https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652582251805474816
*Note that Cryptome is definitely NOT using subterfuge to escape
culpability or advising users of the data leak/breach/compromise/whatever
spin word Cryptome wants to use.
Still refusing to validate what you faked, rigged and released. And will
not, it's your story, run with it.
https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652583921352355840
Our claims remain valid despite the biased cherry-picking so beloved of
childish argumentum ad hominem -- Cicero's bitch.
https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/652579919340421120
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:45 PM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/9/15, Michael Best <themikebest@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
Not sure how I was right AND the info is rigged and disinfo...
QUANTUMSQUIRREL casts suspicion, just like shade, too.
