With a $67B security market heading to $87B by 2016 why would any security firm settle for RSA piddling racketerring? http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/technology/upstarts-challenge-old-timers-in-lucrative-computer-security-field.html Not saying the RSA bashers are diverting attention from their venality, that would be contrary to industry ethics to hide and be hidden, by that I mean journalism and advertising, publicity and campaign bribery, donations to computer education and conferences, dark web sales to rogues and spies, plagiarism and huffy indignation, sabotage and thievery, copyright and DMCA takedowns, well, why preach in this smokey chapel to the stogie-sucking porkies, don't they pay minimum taxes to betray the privacy of ordinary taxpayers who pay the most. FatSec Preacher bellows: Is there any industry more corrupt than the fatuous security industry? FatSec Believers yell back: Nope, and newcomers are flocking in. And so, the sated toads toddle out to fancy chariots stashing drunken investor bedmates, croaking, "And we bloated firms are getting much fatter on hackers. and we pay them shady bitcoins them to boost the flab."