[creation] Re: where to start
- From: "Marshall" <fefinc@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <creation@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:53:44 -0500
Good idea Percival. Judgment begins at the house of God, but family
teaching goes along with that.
("Geocentrism or Geostatic" are more accurate than "Geocentricity" if you
mean to have the earth at the center of the universe.)
Lord Bless,
Marshall
----- Original Message -----
From: "Percival Tanierla" <percy_tan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <creation@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:55 PM
Subject: [creation] Re: where to start
> Dear friends,
>
> I think creationists should start teaching
> Geocentricity= creation in the church instead of
> schools. Let us teach our children at their early age
> about creation and geocentricity and when they go to
> school they already have a good biblical foundation.
> Each family should be encourage to teach their
> children about creation and geocentricty. Every
> evening John (7 years ) read the Bible and after
> short prayer I tell them about Genesis 1- that God is
> the creator of all things. I teach them God made the
> earth for man and Christ came into this world.
>
> I have six children one is in college; one in
> elementary and 2 are in kinder school. I pray that
> when they grow older God,s truth would be more real
> to them. I think this is one of the best way to
> protect our children from error and from deception.
>
> percival
>
>
> --- "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I'm very happy with how this group has started,
> > Marshall, and this posting from Jack is well
> > pitched.
> >
> > (For those who haven't already been there, Marshall
> > has some detailed and interesting material on his
> > website regarding the enormous amount that NASA
> > spends on virtual reality -
> >
> > www.fixedearth.com )
> >
> > Neville.
> >
> > Marshall <fefinc@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Good response on this important subject, Neville!
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jack Lewis"
> > To: ;
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:46 AM
> > Subject: [creation] Virtual/created reality?
> >
> >
> > > Dear Forum Members,
> > > This item may be of interest to many of you
> > especially Neville. I have
> > scanned in a number of letters sent to New Scientist
> > about concern regarding
> > real/simulated data in the media and how to tell the
> > difference.
> > > Simulation signals
> > >
> > > From Chris James
> > >
> > > I strongly agree with Easter Russell (8 January, p
> > 25). There should be a
> > media code of practice requiring that all
> > simulations, artist's impressions
> > and so on are clearly marked as such. How authentic
> > are the pictures of
> > Titan we are being shown from Huygens? New Scientist
> > could set a good
> > example by stating when its pictures are not real -
> > for example, that of
> > comet Tempel i on p 28 of the same issue. Eastleigh,
> > Hampshire, UK
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From Roger Taylor
> > >
> > > I agree completely with Russell, and the sooner
> > the better. Modern imaging
> > technology is so powerful, and presumably will
> > become more so, that it could
> > lead to all manner of fraud and deception, and
> > ultimately to an Orwellian
> > rewriting of history. This is not something we
> > should tempt our politicians
> > with. Meols, Cheshire, UK
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From Peter Strickland
> > >
> > > It is a mistake to think of films or photographs
> > as real. When you take
> > into account the choices that go into what to point
> > the camera at and when
> > to film, there is an enormous amount of subjectivity
> > involved. Then there
> > are choices about zoom, focus and aperture, which
> > all affect what is seen
> > and how it is portrayed. And then, of course, the
> > resulting film or
> > photograph will be edited, which will involve
> > various digitally applied
> > modifications, and, in film, choices about timing,
> > sequences and so on. The
> > difference between photography and digital imagery
> > is more of a perceived
> > idea about authenticity than any practical
> > difference. Leeds, UK
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From Stu Witner
> > >
> > > Once begun, where does one stop, I wonder? For
> > example, all images from
> > the Hubble Space Telescope are "simulated" in that
> > the colours are computer
> > generated. The colours are not only beautiful but
> > enable researchers to
> > learn much more from them than if they were "real".
> > >
> > > Then there is the philosophical argument, "what is
> > truth?", not to mention
> > the obvious public taste for drama over reality. I'm
> > afraid Russell may be
> > tilting at windmills, 21st-century style. Seattle,
> > Washington, US
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There was also an amusing cartoon which I shall
> > have to describe in the
> > absence of a method for posting.
> > >
> > > It shows an office with a sign saying 'ECONOMY
> > SPACE PROGRAMMES INC.' and
> > an assitant showing round a bemedalled, uniformed
> > 'top brass' type
> > character. In the office is an artist painting and a
> > lady sitting at a piece
> > of electronic equipment. The assistant is saying to
> > the visitor,
> > >
> > > "Ron does lurid images and Sue does crackly sound
> > effects".
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I wonder if any of these people have seen the
> > video (available from myself
> > on a CD) 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the
> > Moon'. Check out
> > Neville's website, he has beaten the letter writers
> > to it!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jack
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 -
> > Release Date: 1/27/2005
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release
> > Date: 1/27/2005
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even
> > more fun!
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release Date: 1/27/2005
>
>
--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release Date: 1/27/2005
Other related posts:
