Typical slander of Catholicism. Neville, just drop me from the list = since I seem to be the source of contention. MAC +JMJ+=20 -----Original Message----- From: creation-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx = [mailto:creation-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Curnow Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:24 AM To: Creation Freelist Cc: Eric Curnow Subject: [creation] creation@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Dear Neville, I've been putting into the trash what has been sent to me since I asked=20 for my name to be removed from your mailing list, but on looking to see=20 if your personal email was confirming my removal or not, noticed that=20 you'd like me to reconsider. That is probably a wise thing to do -=20 thank you for the suggestion, so please do keep me added until I've had=20 an opportunity to reconsider properly. I'm going away (DV) for a few days, so will take copies of what has=20 recently arrived and think and pray. However, generally-speaking I am=20 doubtful, as I basically hold to the traditional evangelical views of=20 hell, Catholicism, etc., and to the scripture "can two walk together=20 except they be agreed?" (Amos 3:3) I believe scripture says 'No.' Like Philip, I have little time to joust with those who have no=20 intention of yielding their will to God, and hence His Word=20 (scripture). Through scripture I have encountered the reality of the=20 Lord Jesus, got to know and trust Him, and for me, now, He is the=20 ultimate reality from which everything else takes its meaning. Other=20 brothers called to dialogue with those who have not yet bowed the knee=20 to Him are welcome to engage in this interaction, and I praise God for=20 them and bless them, but there are loads of resources, individuals,=20 organisations and websites where this is already done adequately, and I=20 don't want to be involved in one myself. I had hoped that in this list,=20 some like-hearted/like-minded individuals would be searching their way=20 forward to coming to a common mind about Creation Science and=20 Geocentrism, and as it does not seem to be working out like that at=20 present, I suspect I don't really want involvement in it. But this may=20 change in the light of my reconsideration, I suppose. Drawing to a close, I've decided to accompany this with the email 'Tone=20 and Accuracy', which I composed just before I resigned, and then=20 decided against sending because as I was going to leave, it seemed=20 unnecessary to start a conversation I was not going to be around to=20 take farther forward. Now I am re-evaluating my decision, I should at=20 least be around long enough to handle any comment on it, and hope it=20 might still be of value to the forum anyway. We need a lot more grace=20 to oil the relationships between us, and that can only possibly come=20 from those who have themselves received it! Let me make this perfectly clear: I am not decrying you or others=20 generally discussing belief to find truth - I did a great deal in my=20 younger days - it is just not what I feel *I* should be involved in=20 myself at present. God bless, Eric On 6 Feb 2005, at 05:49, Dr. Neville Jones wrote: > Dear Eric, > =A0 > Please read my reply to Philip first and reconsider. If you still want = > to go, then I will unsubscribe you, of course. > =A0 > You have a wealth of experience in this field and your views are=20 > highly thought of by several of us here. Please, therefore, don't give = > up. > =A0 > Yours in Christ, > =A0 > Neville. > > > Eric Curnow <eric.curnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Neville, > > Thanks for a few days on "freelists", but I've decided not to continue > with it. There is just too great a divergence of views to waste time > trying to sort the wheat from the chaff. > > Please remove my name from the site. > > Thanks, and Lord bless, > > Eric > > > ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!=20