[creation] Re: God bless

  • From: "Marshall" <fefinc@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <creation@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:02:17 -0400

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Percival Tanierla" <percy_tan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <creation@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:16 AM
Subject: [creation] Re: God bless


> Dear Marshall,
> 
>     Good afternoon!  How are you today  hope all is
> well  with  you.  One of my pastor friends  who read
> your book is really convinced  that  your view is
> correct. He name is nelson Carullo pastor of Grace
> christian chrurch.  There is a growing interest  that
> the earth is not a moving body in the  solar syystem.
> 
>     I hope someday you could come and  give lectures
> on this vital subject.
> 
>      God bless you.
> 
>    percival
> --- Marshall <fefinc@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Good idea Percival.  Judgment begins at the house of
> > God, but family
> > teaching goes along with that.
> > ("Geocentrism or Geostatic" are more accurate than
> > "Geocentricity" if you
> > mean to have the earth at the center of the
> > universe.)
> > 
> > Lord Bless,
> > 
> > Marshall
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Percival Tanierla" <percy_tan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <creation@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:55 PM
> > Subject: [creation] Re: where to start
> > 
> > 
> > > Dear friends,
> > >
> > >    I think creationists should  start teaching
> > > Geocentricity= creation in the church instead of
> > > schools. Let us teach our children at their  early
> > age
> > > about creation and geocentricity and when they go
> > to
> > > school they already have a good  biblical
> > foundation.
> > > Each family should  be encourage to teach their
> > > children  about creation and geocentricty. Every
> > > evening  John (7 years ) read the Bible  and after
> > > short prayer I tell them about Genesis 1- that God
> > is
> > > the creator of all things. I teach them God made
> > the
> > > earth for man and Christ came into this world.
> > >
> > >   I have six children one is in college; one  in
> > > elementary and  2 are in kinder  school. I pray
> > that
> > > when they grow older  God,s truth would be more
> > real
> > > to them.  I think this is one of the best way to
> > > protect our children from error  and from
> > deception.
> > >
> > >    percival
> > >
> > >
> > > --- "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm very happy with how this group has started,
> > > > Marshall, and this posting from Jack is well
> > > > pitched.
> > > >
> > > > (For those who haven't already been there,
> > Marshall
> > > > has some detailed and interesting material on
> > his
> > > > website regarding the enormous amount that NASA
> > > > spends on virtual reality -
> > > >
> > > > www.fixedearth.com )
> > > >
> > > > Neville.
> > > >
> > > > Marshall <fefinc@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Good response on this important subject,
> > Neville!
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jack Lewis"
> > > > To: ;
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:46 AM
> > > > Subject: [creation] Virtual/created reality?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Forum Members,
> > > > > This item may be of interest to many of you
> > > > especially Neville. I have
> > > > scanned in a number of letters sent to New
> > Scientist
> > > > about concern regarding
> > > > real/simulated data in the media and how to tell
> > the
> > > > difference.
> > > > > Simulation signals
> > > > >
> > > > > From Chris James
> > > > >
> > > > > I strongly agree with Easter Russell (8
> > January, p
> > > > 25). There should be a
> > > > media code of practice requiring that all
> > > > simulations, artist's impressions
> > > > and so on are clearly marked as such. How
> > authentic
> > > > are the pictures of
> > > > Titan we are being shown from Huygens? New
> > Scientist
> > > > could set a good
> > > > example by stating when its pictures are not
> > real -
> > > > for example, that of
> > > > comet Tempel i on p 28 of the same issue.
> > Eastleigh,
> > > > Hampshire, UK
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From Roger Taylor
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree completely with Russell, and the
> > sooner
> > > > the better. Modern imaging
> > > > technology is so powerful, and presumably will
> > > > become more so, that it could
> > > > lead to all manner of fraud and deception, and
> > > > ultimately to an Orwellian
> > > > rewriting of history. This is not something we
> > > > should tempt our politicians
> > > > with. Meols, Cheshire, UK
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From Peter Strickland
> > > > >
> > > > > It is a mistake to think of films or
> > photographs
> > > > as real. When you take
> > > > into account the choices that go into what to
> > point
> > > > the camera at and when
> > > > to film, there is an enormous amount of
> > subjectivity
> > > > involved. Then there
> > > > are choices about zoom, focus and aperture,
> > which
> > > > all affect what is seen
> > > > and how it is portrayed. And then, of course,
> > the
> > > > resulting film or
> > > > photograph will be edited, which will involve
> > > > various digitally applied
> > > > modifications, and, in film, choices about
> > timing,
> > > > sequences and so on. The
> > > > difference between photography and digital
> > imagery
> > > > is more of a perceived
> > > > idea about authenticity than any practical
> > > > difference. Leeds, UK
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From Stu Witner
> > > > >
> > > > > Once begun, where does one stop, I wonder? For
> > > > example, all images from
> > > > the Hubble Space Telescope are "simulated" in
> > that
> > > > the colours are computer
> > > > generated. The colours are not only beautiful
> > but
> > > > enable researchers to
> > > > learn much more from them than if they were
> > "real".
> > > > >
> > > > > Then there is the philosophical argument,
> > "what is
> > > > truth?", not to mention
> > > > the obvious public taste for drama over reality.
> > I'm
> > > > afraid Russell may be
> > > > tilting at windmills, 21st-century style.
> > Seattle,
> > > > Washington, US
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There was also an amusing cartoon which I
> > shall
> > > > have to describe in the
> > > > absence of a method for posting.
> > > > >
> > > > > It shows an office with a sign saying 'ECONOMY
> > > > SPACE PROGRAMMES INC.' and
> > > > an assitant showing round a bemedalled,
> > uniformed
> > > > 'top brass' type
> > > > character. In the office is an artist painting
> > and a
> > > > lady sitting at a piece
> > > > of electronic equipment. The assistant is saying
> > to
> > > > the visitor,
> > > > >
> > > > > "Ron does lurid images and Sue does crackly
> > sound
> > > > effects".
> > > > >
> > 
> === message truncated ===
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.3 - Release Date: 4/5/2005
> 
> 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.3 - Release Date: 4/5/2005


Other related posts: