Re: this is what i found in canal walk
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:29:42 +0200
When faced with a mob of guys complaining about the same thing? I'd like to
see.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:29 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> We hav no idea how stupid these ppl can get.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:26:41 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: this is what i found in canal walk
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> They do care about your money and they do care about having a good
> reputation. If customers are unhappy, there goes their income. They don't
> need to care about your happiness. If more than one customer is upset about
> something and is vocal about it, I doubt they'd be stupid enough to ignore
> them. Where there's smoke, there's fire.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> they don't care about your happiness wtf???????
>
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: this is what i found in canal walk
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:46:22 +0000
>
>
> It's not about whether or not they care.
> They want to make money. If changing a setting on the machine (like the
> input lag) will make a customer happy and won't change their bottom line,
> then they will do it - assuming it's not much effort on their part.
> Changing the round time is a different matter.
>
> Anyways, what do you lose by asking?
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 27 March 2014 2:44 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: this is what i found in canal walk
>
> how do I look stupid when im saying keep it real? these fekkers don't
> give a fek man. wtf don't you understand?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:27:34 +0200
> Subject: Re: this is what i found in canal walk
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Lol, OK Nic. In your opinion, what is it about this "hack" that would
> cause more input lag than the original?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Lies.
> It is a PC-hack.
> The arcade version runs on PC architecture, sure. There is a security
> dongle for running the game tho.
> The hack makes it run on any pc by bypassing the security.
> Hack.
> Not the same as the orginal.
> Whatever.
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> It's not a PC hack. It's the real software running on Windows, just
> like the arcade version. That option reduces the lag by 2f. You won't
> notice it if your hardware is not fast enough to run the game at 60fps.
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well, the game didn't need to be on a PS4, but it looks that much
> prettier on it.
> The gameplay is similar with little innovation.
> The acting is excellent, and the characters feel real.
> The city seems a bit sparser than the other titles, and the NPC's
> could've had more variation, not that it matters when you see very little
> of them. lol.
> Getting around with powers is what's it's all about.
> I couldn't stop playing.
> I found myself doing side missions because I didn't want the story to
> progress too fast, and then the side missions were an excuse to try
> different approaches to the combat.
> @ilitirit
> The lag fix did dick for the lag when I changed it on the PC-hack of
> KOF13.
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Impressions sofar?
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:11:11 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: this is what i found in canal walk
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Playing it already.
> :D
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I played some Infamous 1
>
> Enjoyed it for the most part but just kinda lost interist after a
> while... not sure why.
>
> Will see how this stacks up when I get to it
>
>
> You getting it?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:59:24 +0200
> Subject: Re: this is what i found in canal walk
>
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> SUUPER EXITED, for your part.
> Did you play the others at all?
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Ah ok
>
> Cool
>
> Should hopefully get to check it out soon
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:50:19 +0200
>
> Subject: RE: this is what i found in canal walk
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cool, the game has an online (off console) component that involves
> detective work.
> I don't want to spoil anything, but I must say something about the game
> that I cannot keep to myself.
> It's only because I think you are a fan of a specific anime.
> There is a conduit in the game that has the most exciting ability, and I
> hope that it is similar in uses to the anime characters.
>
> The Anime is "READ OR DIE"
> Spoiler Protected :)
> On 27 Mar 2014 10:33, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I have it... havent had a chance to even touch it yet.
> >
> > Will probably only give it a go on the weekend
> >
> > ________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
