Sure. @ Paas - the XP bonus is until the 24th. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ryan Williams Sent: 04 March 2014 8:29 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: hi We can discuss the D3 stuff later. Try to keep the mails focus on fighting games *lol* On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:19 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: morning peeps @sap, I see the community 50% exp buff is still there, I checked this morning. We must play tonight get all that bonus exp. ________________________________ Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 03:03:10 +0200 Subject: Re: hi From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I suppose "I don't know". Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter". I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I always go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will shoot left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the best option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in any living organism. Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will be to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie changes too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least gives me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a single thing. Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is scary. DP could just be from reaction. TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart. It catches you unawares and you lose the match :-) Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though. So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't? Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying, doesn't really matter. ********************************************************************** The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software.