RE: hi
- From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:44:22 +0000
The movie was good imo.
Not amazing or anything but it did a decent job.
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:31:40 +0200
Subject: Re: hi
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'd love to read the book. Haven't watched the movie, but I think I should do
that first. I tend to nitpick if I read the book first.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I can imagine enders is a good read but I agree with my mystery
compadres on the movie being pretty lame.
On 26/02/2014, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You did. It's called Starship Troopers. Minus the little kids.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:27 PM, lindsey kiviets
> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> I would watch that
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:25:47 +0000
>>
>>
>> Have the little kids fight be big ass bug aliens? Sure, that makes good
>> sense. Maybe you should write screen plays.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 26 February 2014 12:22 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> I liked that we are the ones attacking the aliens, but other than that I
>> dunno.
>>
>> maybe I would've liked them to physically fight the aliens.
>>
>> I just think its a kuk story, and the only thing that prevented it from
>> going straight to video is Harrison ford and Ben kingsley putting their
>> name on it.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:08:05 +0000
>>
>> What were you looking for out of the film? While I wish they'd kept other
>> stuff from the book, I liked the film.
>>
>> Just feeding the trolls here...
>>
>>
>>
>> @Kahn - I want to run Stone Vigil and Darkhold. Don't remember them at
>> all, so the runs may be...interesting.
>>
>> Running back and forth really does help avoid the Chimera's breath.
>> Another guy told me to do against the Brayflox poison dragon.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 26 February 2014 12:02 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> he took a chance , he didn't know it would work. he didn't know how many
>> queens there was.
>>
>> it was blind luck. this movie is kuk
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:59:17 +0000
>>
>> It wasn't just luck. Both Ender and Mazer Rackham were able to see
>> through
>> the swarm of ships and detect that they're following a pattern with the
>> Queen ship at the centre.
>>
>> This was explained in the film as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 26 February 2014 11:51 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: hi
>>
>>
>>
>> im glad I never went to the cinema to watch that kuk.
>>
>> @gb. well done on your synopsis of the movie. well said.
>>
>> ender makes the earth beat the aliens so bad. WTF, we lost , 10 million
>> people died, its just by luck that fkn ben kingsley found the queen.
>> otherwise we would've been dead. kuk movie.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:39:44 +0200
>> Subject: Re: hi
>> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Haha, I didn't like the film, Ben. I was in the cinema, waiting for it to
>> end. Felt like torture.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I dont even...
>>
>>
>> Maybe LB hijacked his e-mail?
>>
>> That or somebody else has stooped to new all time low
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:50:22 +0200
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> Enders Game is horrible and filled with fail. What the hell?
>>
>> "Oh, look at me, I'm a kid with brilliant strategic ability and shit.
>> Lets
>> fly around and play laser tag. Ohh, lets play StarCraft 3D... oh... I
>> killed everyone in my army to commit genocide. He don't know. Now you
>> now.
>> Lets save alien eggs now."
>>
>> Glad when he killed that short guy though, that was fun.
>>
>> On 26 Feb 2014 10:10, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Enders was good. Just wish it was longer.
>>
>> Fuck you LB
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: hi
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 05:23:55 +0000
>>
>> Enders game, whata kuk movie. full of kuk.
>>
>> @di, goodstuff on d3. will download it soon.
>>
>> @iltirt, first 10 seconds of s2 of magi will blow your mind. This is gna
>> be good.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:43:57 +0200
>> Subject: Re: hi
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> This set was waaaaaay back. Notice how many times Daigo dropped DP FADC.
>> Noone really knew how to play SFVI back then. The next time the during
>> the
>> concept matches Daigo raped him. Inoue is a good friend of Daigo. He
>> used
>> to run (or maybe still does) run an arcade called "Game Inn Sakura".
>> Hence Daigo's online name "gameinn". He said he got the XBL account from
>> a
>> friend of his (most probably Inoue).
>>
>> Back in those days, noone knew how to really "play" the game. No knock
>> down setups. No Sagat or Akuma or Seth or Cammy dominance. Just pure DF
>> and random Ultras. Once people learned how to play the game it was a
>> very
>> different story.
>>
>> Here you can see Daigo vs Inoue once the metagame was kinda figured out:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmN_77k5OA4
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Is it just me... or does Vanilla SF look... faster?
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oWAPsF738N8
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Sell out...
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I feel bad about this. I've dedicated too much time playing AE and no
>> time
>> > playing KOF. LOL.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> SF is always a given. Consistently the most popular FG at CTS events.
>> >> Usually attracts players from all over (East London, JHB, etc). I'm
>> >> not
>> sure
>> >> if Tekken and Mahvel will perform as well as they did before, but we'd
>> >> probably have to go with those. I think we dropped KOF because there
>> just
>> >> wasn't enough interest the last time around (a damn shame too,
>> considering
>> >> that all of the players are really talented). Injustice might pull
>> numbers,
>> >> but there aren't that many of us that own the game. MK is dead (The
>> >> Bridgetown guys still play it, I think, but that's it).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
>> >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I can assist with the UCon thing - assuming I'm in CT at the time.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Are you serious about SF being the only given? It won't be much of a
>> CTS
>> >>> without other fighting games, even if they're run their course -
>> Tekken,
>> >>> Mahvel, KOF - if not these games, then what?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I wouldn't mind seeing MK or Injustice there, but they probably have
>> less
>> >>> players than Mahvel.
>> >>>
>> >>> Too bad that no one here has KI...
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> >>> On Behalf Of Ryan Williams
>> >>> Sent: 25 February 2014 1:08 PM
>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> Subject: Re: hi
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Ok peeps, UCON 2014 will be taking place on the 29th-30th of March.
>> >>> The
>> >>> Genshiken crew require 8 consoles+screens. Who will be able to
>> >>> assist?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> One other thing. A tentative date has been set for CTS5 (10 May
>> >>> 2014).
>> >>> I've enquired about the availability of the Jameson and Molly
>> >>> Blackburn
>> >>> halls so we'll see how that goes. As for tournament games, the only
>> given is
>> >>> SF. Tekken is dead. Mahvel might get a few numbers but is on shaky
>> ground.
>> >>> KOF13? Let's not even go there *lol* I'd welcome suggestions though
>> >>> :P
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
>> >>> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Okay, cool. I've tanked it a couple of times, so should be fine.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think I've only ever run Darkhold and Stone Vigil once, back when I
>> >>> started the game.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> >>> On Behalf Of euraima tobias
>> >>> Sent: 25 February 2014 11:45 AM
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> Subject: RE: hi
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Cutters is lvl 38 so after a duty roulette I should be able to.
>> >>>
>> >>> ________________________________
>> >>>
>> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> e-mail
>> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>> communication in
>> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>> send to
>> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>> it. If
>> >>> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or
>> >>> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>> prohibited and
>> >>> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>> subject
>> >>> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>> >>> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in
>> >>> this
>> >>> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> >>> business
>> of
>> >>> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >>>
>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>> lost,
>> >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >>>
>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> services
>> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>> Swiss
>> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> independent
>> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services
>> >>> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and
>> >>> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>> the
>> >>> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained
>> >>> from your KPMG representative.
>> >>>
>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>> >>> by
>> >>> AntiVirus software.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ________________________________
>> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> e-mail
>> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>> communication in
>> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>> send to
>> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>> it. If
>> >>> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or
>> >>> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>> prohibited and
>> >>> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>> subject
>> >>> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>> >>> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in
>> >>> this
>> >>> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> >>> business
>> of
>> >>> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >>>
>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>> lost,
>> >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >>>
>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> services
>> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>> Swiss
>> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> independent
>> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services
>> >>> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and
>> >>> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>> the
>> >>> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained
>> >>> from your KPMG representative.
>> >>>
>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>> >>> by
>> >>> AntiVirus software.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> =========================================================================
>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>> in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>> to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>> it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>> this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>> information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free,
>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>> Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>> be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>> in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>> to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>> it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>> this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>> information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free,
>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>> Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>> be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>> in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>> to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>> it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>> this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>> information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free,
>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>> Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>> be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
=========================================================================
You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
Other related posts:
