Yea, that is how I was doing it.
Crafting bypass chips and looking for signal towers
I am up to a 40slot ship at the moment
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 19 August 2016 08:59 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: hello
You can hunt, or you can craft override chips (or whatever they are called) and
repeatedly search for signals. Personally, I just end up doing whatever I feel
like.
On 19 Aug 2016 10:04, "Wynand-Ben"
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Ive had a few of those before where buildings arent on flat surfaces but
nothing to that extreme.
Actually managed to 100% a planet by "accident" yesterday while hunting for
wrecked ships
Noticed that I found most the animals already and decided to go look for the
last 2.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 19 August 2016 07:36 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: hello
Go home outpost you're drunk.
On Friday, 19 August 2016, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hope to see a giant sand worm in NMS
Speaking of No Man's Sky.
Even alien engineers are idiots.
On 19 Aug 2016 08:57, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Wynand-Ben
Sent: 18 August 2016 05:06 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: hello
Indeed
Jump frequently to new systems. Then pop to each planet/moon to see if it
looks interisting or if there is anything useful.
Moving on after a few minutes if the planet is not to my liking.
I want to 100% atleast 1 planet. Will see if I find a nice one during my
system hopping.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 18 August 2016 02:30 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: hello
LMAO
I realize that I'm playing the game completely randomly compared to you guys.
Hop in the jet, fly around until something interests me, do some stuff...
repeat. 100% a planet, time to go.
I really hope base building comes into the game.
@Gieroad
I avoid all internet stuff telling me how to play my games. Knowing that
there's some kind of map is nice.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
My scavenging has given me 3 or 4 warp reactor blueprints.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
That I did notice.
I have the plans for the warp reactor tau that is my next objective
On Thursday, 18 August 2016, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another useful thing I only recently found out.
When checking out star systems to warp to there are actually 4 different types
of systems.
The default ones that you get directed towards are all yellow. The most basic
kind.
There are also red, green, blue ones and you need specific hyperdrive upgrades
in order to go to them. (Even if you are in range you cant warp to them with
your starting hyper drive).
Apparently these have chances to produce the more extreme or rare stuff.
Weirder planets, rarer resources etc. etc.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 18 August 2016 12:51 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: hello
I haven't googled the op tech in this game yet so this info is rad.
On Thursday, 18 August 2016, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It does. Thats the only place ive really done it myself.
Think it gets yellow outline if you let the mining beam stuff touch each other.
No idea how big or effective the bonus is unfortunatly
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 18 August 2016 12:37 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: hello
I wonder if it's the same with the multitool
On Thursday, 18 August 2016, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah I noticed that with my new ship.
All the pulse weapon things were outlined in red.
Thats good info.
On Thursday, 18 August 2016, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From what I have read yes they do stack. But I havent personally tested.
Dont think you can have multiples of the same quality tho.
ie You can have +1, +2, +3 all working together.
Your upgrades also get bonus depending on their placement. You will see their
borders changes if they are next to similar upgrades. (ie all the mining beam
upgrades are touching each other and/or the beam.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 18 August 2016 12:19 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: hello
The rare item planet also worked as a bit of a triple farm for me because it
had heridium monoliths and every now and then I would pomp the drones for
platinum .... or was it titanium .... well ja.
Do you guys know if the upgrades stack ?
On Thursday, 18 August 2016, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@Paas
I missed part of your question.
Yeah, I'm completing the planets. It doesn't make quick bank though.
The diversity of a planet can really change. The moon I was on went from flat,
to full of holes, to marsh and then mountains.
I'll share some glitchy pics of where a base was built on a mound and one of
those (silicate?) monoliths later.
Alien engineering fail.
The frozen armpit of a planet I started on was pretty much the same all round.
:/
...oh, and I found a base under water.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Potato used to stream...
Just a warning.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDS_EvOWKEA
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
