Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:08:48 +0200
Also, I'm only an individual, so whether or not I participate is
irrelevant. The majority is what is important.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Depends on the level of interest, I suppose. That's usually a good
> starting point.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:44 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> if I run the tourney will you participate?
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:01:02 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> So that's why I'm saying, run tournaments for games that will bring the
>> hype levels up. I'm giving you the opportunity.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I did gauge , last Saturday I gauged the salt levels, it was acidic.
>>
>> we need to bring the hype level up and the salty levels down.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:52:21 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Well, run a tournament for the games then. Bring a PC or laptop,
>> whichever works. I'll leave mine at home. Then you just need to set up the
>> Challonge brackets and you're good to go. Don't forget to gauge the level
>> of interest for the games you want to run the tournaments for.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> everyone feels the same way
>>
>> now you have a choice
>>
>> SF the movie the game OR dong dong never DIE
>>
>> tsek salie , don't come and quote me, im not a DVD
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:44:30 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> If everyone else feels the same way, I'll stop the tourneys this
>> Saturday. Seriously.
>>
>> I don't play DS3.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:38 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> salie plays bb hood like a lame drunk.
>>
>> sf memory lane battles are getting old man, its not like ive stopped
>> playing these games I just don't play it as regular as I used to.
>>
>> let me body u in ds3
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:34:39 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> ft5 tonight
>>
>> I win we play ds3
>>
>> u win we play dong dong
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:30:12 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You can't play Darkstalkers 3. And no.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> darkstalkers 3 invitional les go!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:27:08 +0200
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Yeah, and then I blocked your spam and you were free for the rest of the
>> matches. If you didn't mash after getting knocked down every single time,
>> you might have won. Maybe. Actually, no.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> tsek sap, get bopped with my young toguru 100% redizzy combos
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:21:10 +0200
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> toguru
>>
>> It's not a major loss. You'll enjoy the hell out of 2. One of the best
>> RPGs ever made.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I didn’t play Witcher 1 though. Apparently the story is supposed to
>> continue from some choices in the first one.
>> Don’t have the time to be playing the old one as well though.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>> *Sent:* 21 October 2014 12:14 PM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>
>> Witcher 2 is a good test. That game is one hell of a resource hog.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> My new graphics card arrived this morning. Need to plug that puppy in
>> and see how Witcher 2 runs. Probably better off with something like Shadow
>> of Mordor where I will be able to see just how sweet the thing is.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> *Sent:* 21 October 2014 10:12 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>
>> Man. That PS2 hackery.
>>
>> Some games look so good in widescreen.
>> Devil May Cry 1 feels so much less claustrophobic.
>> We seriously have to do a DefJam FFNY battle at some stage as well. The
>> game looks good for its years.
>> Now I have to remember wtf did I do to get NeoGeo Battle Colisseum to
>> run? I remember being surprised as hell when Manase told me his "just
>> worked"
>> Street Fighter Alpha Anthology, and Darkstalkers collection run on opl
>> version 5 revision 5.
>> I gotta try and find that.
>> On 21 Oct 2014 07:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Morning peeps,
>>
>> Blanka is really strong in sf, he should place higher in tournaments
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:40:20 +0200
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> TJ Combo too stronk
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNFhOwzNzCY
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> dafuq? Nemo saying Ryu is bottom tier.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Some really awesome matches here. That Ken setup into combo is
>> ridiculous.
>>
>> @LB, what time should we start?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Checkout the CE Blanka vortex @ 13m33s:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR4jV58lbvo
>> Also check out the nice Ken setup into combo he does @ 20m41s.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> BTW, CE is still alive and well in Brazil. They had an international
>> tournament earlier this year:
>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAnXZIS9_a8mQJ85rMgEh0Q
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> @Manase:
>> This guy has some nice "classic" CE Boxer (ie. the weaker version)
>> matches on his channel:
>> https://www.youtube.com/user/sf2ce/search?query=Balrog
>> Seems like vs Shotos you have to stand in the range where HP trades with
>> fireballs. There is also a range where if Boxer blocks a fireball he can
>> do dash straight and it will punish the next fireball. He also has a
>> blockstring that leaves him just out for cr.mk range for a whiff-punish.
>> (sound is quite loud)
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQZKQsj_9g4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts: