LB is hectic. On 21 October 2014 13:11, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What did you say about dex ? O_O > > On 21 October 2014 11:15, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Must... have... that... dex.... >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:11:59 +0000 >> >> >> fkn roll off the core stat then. >> >> I got str one and rolled it off for a slot >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:07:52 +0000 >> >> No dex ones. >> >> 1 Str and a bunch of int ones >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:58:33 +0000 >> >> oh, how many unities do u have? >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:57:17 +0000 >> >> If I had unity I would not be sitting on lvl 32 lol >> >> Im running my soj with rrog >> >> http://eu.battle.net/d3/en/profile/PaasHaas-1401/hero/14127246 >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:50:27 +0000 >> >> don't lie >> >> u have soj and unity. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:48:41 +0000 >> >> I have rrog... >> >> Its used for Sunwuko, Augh and blackthorn >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:45:26 +0000 >> >> I see your build , >> >> tsek with your non rrog monk. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:42:52 +0000 >> >> I ran 32gr monk with Blackthornes belt/boots/pants >> >> Just do it lb >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:26:42 +0000 >> >> no man , titan's aren't that expensive. >> >> I think the 970's are yield better performance than titan. >> >> I need boots and a belt then I can run 32 with monk. >> >> @nick , weplord is a kuk game. I hope to play some dong dong on Saturday. >> >> what about sfvsxmen? >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:22:30 +0000 >> >> GTX 970. >> >> Aren’t the Titans 20k each? While I do like PC games, that seems a bit >> excessive. >> >> >> >> BTW, how’s your Barb coming along? Cleared 32 solo yesterday with mine. >> >> >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >> *Sent:* 21 October 2014 10:20 AM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes! >> >> >> >> GTX titan? >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:15:31 +0000 >> >> My new graphics card arrived this morning. Need to plug that puppy in and >> see how Witcher 2 runs. Probably better off with something like Shadow of >> Mordor where I will be able to see just how sweet the thing is. >> >> >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir >> *Sent:* 21 October 2014 10:12 AM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes! >> >> >> >> Man. That PS2 hackery. >> Some games look so good in widescreen. >> Devil May Cry 1 feels so much less claustrophobic. >> We seriously have to do a DefJam FFNY battle at some stage as well. The >> game looks good for its years. >> Now I have to remember wtf did I do to get NeoGeo Battle Colisseum to >> run? I remember being surprised as hell when Manase told me his "just >> worked" >> Street Fighter Alpha Anthology, and Darkstalkers collection run on opl >> version 5 revision 5. >> I gotta try and find that. >> >> On 21 Oct 2014 07:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Morning peeps, >> >> Blanka is really strong in sf, he should place higher in tournaments >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx >> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:40:20 +0200 >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> TJ Combo too stronk >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNFhOwzNzCY >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Ashraf Barendse < >> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> dafuq? Nemo saying Ryu is bottom tier. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Some really awesome matches here. That Ken setup into combo is >> ridiculous. >> >> >> >> @LB, what time should we start? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Checkout the CE Blanka vortex @ 13m33s: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR4jV58lbvo >> >> Also check out the nice Ken setup into combo he does @ 20m41s. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> BTW, CE is still alive and well in Brazil. They had an international >> tournament earlier this year: >> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAnXZIS9_a8mQJ85rMgEh0Q >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> @Manase: >> >> This guy has some nice "classic" CE Boxer (ie. the weaker version) >> matches on his channel: >> https://www.youtube.com/user/sf2ce/search?query=Balrog >> >> Seems like vs Shotos you have to stand in the range where HP trades with >> fireballs. There is also a range where if Boxer blocks a fireball he can >> do dash straight and it will punish the next fireball. He also has a >> blockstring that leaves him just out for cr.mk range for a whiff-punish. >> >> (sound is quite loud) >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQZKQsj_9g4 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> > >