RE: USF4 changes!

  • From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:26:42 +0000

no man , titan's aren't that expensive.
 
I think the 970's are yield better performance than titan.
 
I need boots and a belt then I can run 32 with monk.
 
@nick , weplord is a kuk game. I hope to play some dong dong on Saturday.
 
what about sfvsxmen?
 
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:22:30 +0000









GTX 970.
Aren’t the Titans 20k each? While I do like PC games, that seems a bit 
excessive.
 
BTW, how’s your Barb coming along? Cleared 32 solo yesterday with mine.
 


From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets

Sent: 21 October 2014 10:20 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: USF4 changes!


 

GTX titan?

 




From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: USF4 changes!

Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:15:31 +0000

My new graphics card arrived this morning. Need to plug that puppy in and see 
how Witcher 2 runs. Probably better off with something like Shadow of Mordor 
where
 I will be able to see just how sweet the thing is.
 
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir

Sent: 21 October 2014 10:12 AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
 
Man. That PS2 hackery.

Some games look so good in widescreen.

Devil May Cry 1 feels so much less claustrophobic.

We seriously have to do a DefJam FFNY battle at some stage as well.  The game 
looks good for its years.

Now I have to remember wtf did I do to get NeoGeo Battle Colisseum to run?  I 
remember being surprised as hell when Manase told me his "just worked"

Street Fighter Alpha Anthology, and Darkstalkers collection run on opl version 
5 revision 5.

I gotta try and find that.

On 21 Oct 2014 07:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Morning peeps,

 

Blanka is really strong in sf, he should place higher in tournaments

 




From: 
ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx

Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:40:20 +0200

Subject: Re: USF4 changes!

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

TJ Combo  too stronk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNFhOwzNzCY



 

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:


dafuq? Nemo saying Ryu is bottom tier. 

 





 

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Some really awesome matches here. That Ken setup into combo is ridiculous.

 


@LB, what time should we start?





 

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Checkout the CE Blanka vortex @ 13m33s:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR4jV58lbvo

Also check out the nice Ken setup into combo he does @ 20m41s.




 

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


BTW, CE is still alive and well in Brazil.  They had an international 
tournament earlier this year:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAnXZIS9_a8mQJ85rMgEh0Q


 


 

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





@Manase:

This guy has some nice "classic" CE Boxer (ie.  the weaker version) matches on 
his channel:

https://www.youtube.com/user/sf2ce/search?query=Balrog

Seems like vs Shotos you have to stand in the range where HP trades with 
fireballs.  There is also a range where if Boxer blocks a fireball he can do 
dash straight and it will punish the
 next fireball.  He also has a blockstring that leaves him just out for 
cr.mk range for a whiff-punish.


(sound is quite loud)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQZKQsj_9g4




 







 





 





 





 










The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received
 this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received 
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any
 action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may 
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the 
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 
Opinions, conclusions
 and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to 
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.




This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity
 for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG 
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG 
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes 
itself as such. Information about the
 structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.




The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.
                                          

Other related posts: