I'll give you a FT5, but I won't be surprised when I hear "kak game" after you lose. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:55 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Asinus tuus ferrum calens, > > @sap, that's cool I like non conventional. les go > > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:50:46 +0000 > > > Te audire non possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 20 October 2014 12:43 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes! > > > > why must u be a dick, > > motion to deny vote of stu in abesnita gratitia rigomortus > > ------------------------------ > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:40:14 +0000 > > Not sure what’s going on here. > > Pretty much assume that whatever LB votes, I vote the opposite. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 20 October 2014 12:38 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes! > > > > vote for other games being played at sessions. > > > Yes = 1 vote > No = 2 vote > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:35:47 +0200 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *lol* Go right ahead :P > > > > @Lumi, I was at Canal Walk yesterday and saw that The Evil Within is going > for a lot cheaper than on Steam, so I bought it. Will start playing it > tonight :P > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:33 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > lets put it to a vote > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:31:12 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > No. > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:27 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > yes > > dong dong Saturday? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:23:27 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I prefer the versatility of ST Claw more. > > > > CE Claw has a lot going for him, in terms of good walkspeed, a fast jump > that can be difficult to react to, and solid ranged normals. What he lacks > is the ability to open people up. ST Claw has a far easier time of doing > that than CE Claw. CE Claw's anti-airs also pale in comparison to ST Claw. > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:59 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > u don't like ce claw? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:57:26 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *lol* What are you talking about? I play Claw in ST. > > > > In SF2 CE and HF, I play Guile, Sim, Ken (HF) and Chun. Those are > characters I would classify as my 'mains'. In ST, it's Guile, Chun and Claw. > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:52 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > thought so. > > people underestimate j HK is too good. > > why don't you play claw anymore sap? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:43:57 +0200 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > With Blanka. > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:40 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > @sap, how did GB beat manase and erefaan? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:02:24 +0200 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Nope > > On 20 Oct 2014 10:44, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't know of any. > Never really had the need. > > Maybe the internet knows. > > > > On 19 October 2014 22:10, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yes, yes it is. > Now that you're reading the mails. > > Any way I can get a PS3 controller to work on a PS2? > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > That is beautiful Nicholas !! > > > > On Sunday, October 19, 2014, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Thanks bro > > The only real loss to me was my Mortal Kombat Shaolin Monks hack Iso. I > don't think I have the willpower to re-do the hacking on that one, but you > never know. > > On the plus side, I found some new patches for my games. > > One of particular note is the widescreen Patch for Capcom VS SNK 2 > > From this: > > > > To this > > Should look nice on my samsung monitor. > > And there are some more 480p patches too. Better res is always welcome > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry to hear that bra :( > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < > nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sigh. > PS2 drive corrupted. > Start over. > > On 19 Oct 2014 15:33, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Happy Birthday Zombi-Hunter!!! > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Happy birthday Ashraf, have an awesome day! > > On 18 Oct 2014 10:22 AM, "Kei Ash" <neokash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > LOL did they use his taunt animation in the grab. > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Boxer is getting a dashing command grab in Omega mode > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >