Nope, but it looks cool :) On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:40 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > http://store.steampowered.com/app/23310/ > > anyone played this? > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 15:20:05 +0000 > > > Yup. > *From*: Manase Zote [mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx] > *Sent*: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 04:58 PM South Africa Standard Time > *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes! > > Classic LB :) > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:38 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_XV > > > > its square enix. > > > > lol it was announced in MAY 2006. O_o > > > > > > WTF almost 10 years in development? that cant be right. > > ________________________________ > > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > > Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:35:01 +0000 > > > > > > Still? > > > > I fairly sure it wasnt developed by square to begin with > > > > ________________________________ > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > > Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:31:11 +0000 > > > > is it still being developed by square? > > > > because handling things over to different companies to complete is a > recipe > > for disaster. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > > Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:28:27 +0000 > > > > We have zero info on the game sadly. > > > > The only reason we still know about it is because they keep insisting > that > > its "not scrapped". > > > > Original reveal looked amazing > > > > Hopefully it turns out good... maybe we see it at e3 this year? > > > > wishfull thinking lol > > These kinds of delays rarely end well > > > > ________________________________ > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > > Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:21:40 +0000 > > > > you know wthat gna happen. > > > > they gna make a next gen game that's gna look ass with old gen graphicvs > > > >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:19:13 +0200 > >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx > >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> You mean rescheduled for the PS4. > >> There fixed :) > >> > >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:17 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> wrote: > >> > wasn't it scheduled for ps3? I thought it was scrapped > >> > > >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:12:03 +0200 > >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >> >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx > >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I want The Last Guardian already!!! > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir > >> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > I get confused with this stuff all the time. > >> >> > > >> >> > I want Darksiders 3 > >> >> > :( > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Wynand-Ben < > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thats like saying the new Tomb Raider are from the same makers as > >> >> >> Final > >> >> >> Fantasy because they are both from Square Enix. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The developers make the games, not the publishers or whatever one > >> >> >> calls > >> >> >> them > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:56:45 +0000 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Namco Bandai? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:52:24 +0000 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Its not tho > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:43:49 +0000 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> what if it was made by the same makers as dark souls? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:30:31 +0200 > >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Lords of the fallen looks like a wishy washy Souls copy. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I have no love for these games that try to ride on other > successful > >> >> >> titles > >> >> >> hard work and pioneering. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 27 May 2014 13:50, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Yep. the amount of pressure you can do with all the cancels. very > >> >> >> psychological. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Gado and Shen Long is pretty much the same in 3. They might have > >> >> >> toned > >> >> >> down Shen Long's damage and change some of his move list. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> 3 is pretty much the same as 2. Only difference is combos are a > bit > >> >> >> easier > >> >> >> to connect but it's also easier to escape (air recover). only main > >> >> >> difference is that you benefit in going into beast mode more. so > you > >> >> >> have to > >> >> >> go into beast mode more often than 2. beast mode changes some move > >> >> >> property > >> >> >> to guard breaker, etc. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> If your life is low, beast gauge fills up twice as fast if you > stand > >> >> >> still > >> >> >> in 3 apparently. sorta like a rage/ultra system for a comeback. > >> >> >> which > >> >> >> is > >> >> >> nice. i never realize all these technical stuff...only assumed > >> >> >> because > >> >> >> back > >> >> >> then i didn't look it up lolz what i know is just years of > practice > >> >> >> and > >> >> >> game > >> >> >> play > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Ryan Williams > >> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I remember reading about Gado and Shen Long being very powerful in > >> >> >> 2. > >> >> >> I'm > >> >> >> completely clueless when it comes to 3 though *lol* > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I like the application of guard cancelling for pressure or during > >> >> >> juggles. > >> >> >> It really opens up the game. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> In BR 2 they say it's Gado and Shen Long due to damage. Gado > >> >> >> apparently > >> >> >> has a CH infinite too lolz but it has to land CH and it's not > super > >> >> >> easy to > >> >> >> land either i think. But those 2 are god tier due to damage only, > so > >> >> >> if > >> >> >> you > >> >> >> know how to block...it's fine lolz > >> >> >> > >> >> >> BR 3 it's Uranus, she's stupid fast and her juggles is constant. > But > >> >> >> her > >> >> >> health bar is the lowest...she dies fast and she also > "bounce/float" > >> >> >> higher > >> >> >> than other character...making it easy to combo her too. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I didn't know that each character have different health bar like > SF. > >> >> >> i > >> >> >> thought it only applied to Stun (having the high health) due to > his > >> >> >> slow > >> >> >> speed. Didn't know it applies to all. Gado also have high health. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The more i research, the more bloody roar sounds like SF. they > also > >> >> >> have > >> >> >> the guard attack stuff. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Ryan Williams > >> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Who are the god-tier characters? Most of my BR knowledge stems > from > >> >> >> just > >> >> >> testing stuff in training mode *lol* > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Damn. Bloody Roar 3 system is deep. The system is pretty > >> >> >> good...don't > >> >> >> know > >> >> >> why they didn't do the same for BR4... > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Tier list is pretty good too. Every character is around the same > >> >> >> with > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> exception of 2-3 being god tier...but it still doesn't guarantee > >> >> >> them > >> >> >> wins. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir > >> >> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Imma gonna test out the service and adapter first, then I'll be > >> >> >> ordering > >> >> >> that HDMI jobby > >> >> >> When I order that, I'll order yours. > >> >> >> Otherwise we get more duds. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Ryan Williams > >> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Oh and that multi-out to HDMI? I'd like some of that thank you. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ryan Williams > >> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> SATA!!!!!! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> GIMMEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Have you tested it yet? Is it more stable than the IDE adapter? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir > >> >> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Sooooooo... > >> >> >> Sap, remember that adapter I sold you? > >> >> >> For R400? > >> >> >> The IDE one... > >> >> >> Yeahhhhh... > >> >> >> I just bought this Sata network adapter for the PS2, and there's > >> >> >> this > >> >> >> PS2 > >> >> >> multi-out to HDMI that looks neet too. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Wynand-Ben > >> >> >> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I hope so yea > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:14:58 +0200 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Paas is gonna laugh at us all when KI makes it to PC. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:48 AM, lindsey kiviets > >> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> tsek, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> KI is the revolution. lords of the fallen looks decent and not > >> >> >> exclusive > >> >> >> to any console so ima get it. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I need a 4k monitor to go with my non 4k xbox console. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:44:49 +0000 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> LB you counter revolutionary agent! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:13:28 +0000 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> morning peeps, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> lords of the fallen , is that ds3? its the same genre its made by > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> same > >> >> >> company that made ds3. hmm. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I want to xbone man , you guys are just haters. KI is super fun to > >> >> >> watch, > >> >> >> I tried to locate the online matches max had a while back with top > >> >> >> players. > >> >> >> it was ridiculous, j2g. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> with season 2 coming out , tj combo , raptor and cinder are > defintly > >> >> >> gna > >> >> >> be in the game. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:37:32 +0200 > >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> > >> >> >> That's true, although I prefer 2 more for some reason *lol* > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> 3 isn't much different to 2. there's no new system. that's > probably > >> >> >> why > >> >> >> i > >> >> >> enjoy it before it went to hell with 4 and it's stupid system. > >> >> >> combos > >> >> >> are a > >> >> >> bit easier in 3 than 2 tho. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:49 PM, lindsey kiviets > >> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > http://www.dutycalculator.com/new-import-duty-and-tax-calculation/saved_calculations/view_details/188005117/ > >> >> >> > >> >> >> seems fair > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 17:19:59 +0200 > >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Gamestop is offering Xbox One's for R6080. Good luck getting one > for > >> >> >> under that. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:02 PM, lindsey kiviets > >> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ima get KI, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> with xbone - Kinect being $400 = R5000 here by us , im definetly > >> >> >> getting > >> >> >> it. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I want a stick though damn , its gna be expensive. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 12:59:55 +0000 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The game is free to play, right? > >> >> >> I should probably watch some more vids of the game. I’m thinking > >> >> >> that > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> more you play the game, the more you can see the differences in > the > >> >> >> combos. > >> >> >> I haven’t had a good look at the specific differences in the > combos > >> >> >> for > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> new KI though. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The original ones all had such awesome enders – Jago’s wind kick > >> >> >> ender, > >> >> >> Fulgore’s teleport ender, Glacius’ puddleport ender… > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ] > >> >> >> On Behalf Of Ryan Williams > >> >> >> Sent: 26 May 2014 2:56 PM > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Unfortunately, I will not be one of them. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I've tried really, really hard to like KI. I've watched tournament > >> >> >> footage, tried to understand the meta, character options, etc. I > can > >> >> >> respect > >> >> >> what the game has to offer in terms of fighting mechanics and the > >> >> >> like, > >> >> >> but > >> >> >> the complete package just doesn't appeal to me at all. The only > >> >> >> character > >> >> >> that even remotely appeals to me is Spinal and that really isn't > >> >> >> saying > >> >> >> much. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Even though the gameplay has definitely evolved since release, and > >> >> >> there > >> >> >> are clear meta strategies being employed during matches, > everything > >> >> >> still > >> >> >> looks so... samey... The animations still look jerky instead of > >> >> >> fluid > >> >> >> (I > >> >> >> understand that everyone will have their own opinions on this; > this > >> >> >> is > >> >> >> simply my perspective) and the combos don't have much variety > (even > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> manuals, which is sad). I'd still play the first one - flawed as > it > >> >> >> is > >> >> >> - > >> >> >> over the new one just because of how cool the combos look. There's > >> >> >> just > >> >> >> this > >> >> >> instant appeal and satisfaction when watching/performing combos in > >> >> >> KI1. > >> >> >> In > >> >> >> the new KI, everything just looks really bland and meh. Different > >> >> >> strokes > >> >> >> for different folks, but that's my 2 cents on the game. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair > >> >> >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> BTW, what are the chances that anyone here will get an Xboxone > when > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> hits SA officially? > >> >> >> Just wondering if anyone else will play KI… > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ] > >> >> >> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets > >> >> >> Sent: 26 May 2014 2:38 PM > >> >> >> > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> come play dota2 man. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> you must register your AE on steam anyways. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:26:29 +0200 > >> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes! > >> >> >> From: euraima@xxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> >> Nah man, was flying solo so I called it quits. Im back to lol > again > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > >> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to > this > >> >> >> e-mail > >> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this > >> >> >> communication > >> >> >> in > >> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in > error," > >> >> >> send to > >> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> it. If > >> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > >> >> >> distribution or > >> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is > >> >> >> prohibited and > >> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail > are > >> >> >> subject > >> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client > >> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > >> >> >> this > >> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > >> >> >> business > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > >> >> >> error-free, > >> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, > >> >> >> destroyed, > >> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative > >> >> >> ("KPMG > >> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing > >> >> >> services > >> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a > >> >> >> Swiss > >> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > >> >> >> independent > >> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides > no > >> >> >> services > >> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > >> >> >> distinct and > >> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > >> >> >> obtained > >> >> >> from your KPMG representative. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been > swept > >> >> >> by > >> >> >> AntiVirus software. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ________________________________ > >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > >> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to > this > >> >> >> e-mail > >> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this > >> >> >> communication > >> >> >> in > >> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in > error," > >> >> >> send to > >> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> it. If > >> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > >> >> >> distribution or > >> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is > >> >> >> prohibited and > >> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail > are > >> >> >> subject > >> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client > >> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > >> >> >> this > >> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > >> >> >> business > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > >> >> >> error-free, > >> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, > >> >> >> destroyed, > >> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative > >> >> >> ("KPMG > >> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing > >> >> >> services > >> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a > >> >> >> Swiss > >> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > >> >> >> independent > >> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides > no > >> >> >> services > >> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > >> >> >> distinct and > >> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > >> >> >> obtained > >> >> >> from your KPMG representative. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been > swept > >> >> >> by > >> >> >> AntiVirus software. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting > >> >> Game > >> >> Community mailing list. > >> >> > >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >> ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting > Game > >> Community mailing list. > >> > >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game > Community mailing list. > > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >