RE: USF4 changes!
- From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:35:01 +0000
Still?
I fairly sure it wasnt developed by square to begin with
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:31:11 +0000
is it still being developed by square?
because handling things over to different companies to complete is a recipe for
disaster.
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:28:27 +0000
We have zero info on the game sadly.
The only reason we still know about it is because they keep insisting that its
"not scrapped".
Original reveal looked amazing
Hopefully it turns out good... maybe we see it at e3 this year?
wishfull thinking lol
These kinds of delays rarely end well
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:21:40 +0000
you know wthat gna happen.
they gna make a next gen game that's gna look ass with old gen graphicvs
> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:19:13 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You mean rescheduled for the PS4.
> There fixed :)
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:17 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > wasn't it scheduled for ps3? I thought it was scrapped
> >
> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:12:03 +0200
> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >>
> >> I want The Last Guardian already!!!
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > I get confused with this stuff all the time.
> >> >
> >> > I want Darksiders 3
> >> > :(
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Thats like saying the new Tomb Raider are from the same makers as Final
> >> >> Fantasy because they are both from Square Enix.
> >> >>
> >> >> The developers make the games, not the publishers or whatever one calls
> >> >> them
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:56:45 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Namco Bandai?
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:52:24 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >> Its not tho
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:43:49 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >> what if it was made by the same makers as dark souls?
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:30:31 +0200
> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>
> >> >> Lords of the fallen looks like a wishy washy Souls copy.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have no love for these games that try to ride on other successful
> >> >> titles
> >> >> hard work and pioneering.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 27 May 2014 13:50, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Yep. the amount of pressure you can do with all the cancels. very
> >> >> psychological.
> >> >>
> >> >> Gado and Shen Long is pretty much the same in 3. They might have toned
> >> >> down Shen Long's damage and change some of his move list.
> >> >>
> >> >> 3 is pretty much the same as 2. Only difference is combos are a bit
> >> >> easier
> >> >> to connect but it's also easier to escape (air recover). only main
> >> >> difference is that you benefit in going into beast mode more. so you
> >> >> have to
> >> >> go into beast mode more often than 2. beast mode changes some move
> >> >> property
> >> >> to guard breaker, etc.
> >> >>
> >> >> If your life is low, beast gauge fills up twice as fast if you stand
> >> >> still
> >> >> in 3 apparently. sorta like a rage/ultra system for a comeback. which
> >> >> is
> >> >> nice. i never realize all these technical stuff...only assumed because
> >> >> back
> >> >> then i didn't look it up lolz what i know is just years of practice and
> >> >> game
> >> >> play
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I remember reading about Gado and Shen Long being very powerful in 2.
> >> >> I'm
> >> >> completely clueless when it comes to 3 though *lol*
> >> >>
> >> >> I like the application of guard cancelling for pressure or during
> >> >> juggles.
> >> >> It really opens up the game.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In BR 2 they say it's Gado and Shen Long due to damage. Gado apparently
> >> >> has a CH infinite too lolz but it has to land CH and it's not super
> >> >> easy to
> >> >> land either i think. But those 2 are god tier due to damage only, so if
> >> >> you
> >> >> know how to block...it's fine lolz
> >> >>
> >> >> BR 3 it's Uranus, she's stupid fast and her juggles is constant. But
> >> >> her
> >> >> health bar is the lowest...she dies fast and she also "bounce/float"
> >> >> higher
> >> >> than other character...making it easy to combo her too.
> >> >>
> >> >> I didn't know that each character have different health bar like SF. i
> >> >> thought it only applied to Stun (having the high health) due to his
> >> >> slow
> >> >> speed. Didn't know it applies to all. Gado also have high health.
> >> >>
> >> >> The more i research, the more bloody roar sounds like SF. they also
> >> >> have
> >> >> the guard attack stuff.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Who are the god-tier characters? Most of my BR knowledge stems from
> >> >> just
> >> >> testing stuff in training mode *lol*
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Damn. Bloody Roar 3 system is deep. The system is pretty good...don't
> >> >> know
> >> >> why they didn't do the same for BR4...
> >> >>
> >> >> Tier list is pretty good too. Every character is around the same with
> >> >> the
> >> >> exception of 2-3 being god tier...but it still doesn't guarantee them
> >> >> wins.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Imma gonna test out the service and adapter first, then I'll be
> >> >> ordering
> >> >> that HDMI jobby
> >> >> When I order that, I'll order yours.
> >> >> Otherwise we get more duds.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh and that multi-out to HDMI? I'd like some of that thank you.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> SATA!!!!!!
> >> >>
> >> >> GIMMEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
> >> >>
> >> >> Have you tested it yet? Is it more stable than the IDE adapter?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Sooooooo...
> >> >> Sap, remember that adapter I sold you?
> >> >> For R400?
> >> >> The IDE one...
> >> >> Yeahhhhh...
> >> >> I just bought this Sata network adapter for the PS2, and there's this
> >> >> PS2
> >> >> multi-out to HDMI that looks neet too.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I hope so yea
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:14:58 +0200
> >> >>
> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>
> >> >> Paas is gonna laugh at us all when KI makes it to PC.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:48 AM, lindsey kiviets
> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> tsek,
> >> >>
> >> >> KI is the revolution. lords of the fallen looks decent and not
> >> >> exclusive
> >> >> to any console so ima get it.
> >> >>
> >> >> I need a 4k monitor to go with my non 4k xbox console.
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:44:49 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> LB you counter revolutionary agent!
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:13:28 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >> morning peeps,
> >> >>
> >> >> lords of the fallen , is that ds3? its the same genre its made by the
> >> >> same
> >> >> company that made ds3. hmm.
> >> >>
> >> >> I want to xbone man , you guys are just haters. KI is super fun to
> >> >> watch,
> >> >> I tried to locate the online matches max had a while back with top
> >> >> players.
> >> >> it was ridiculous, j2g.
> >> >>
> >> >> with season 2 coming out , tj combo , raptor and cinder are defintly
> >> >> gna
> >> >> be in the game.
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:37:32 +0200
> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>
> >> >> That's true, although I prefer 2 more for some reason *lol*
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> 3 isn't much different to 2. there's no new system. that's probably why
> >> >> i
> >> >> enjoy it before it went to hell with 4 and it's stupid system. combos
> >> >> are a
> >> >> bit easier in 3 than 2 tho.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:49 PM, lindsey kiviets
> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.dutycalculator.com/new-import-duty-and-tax-calculation/saved_calculations/view_details/188005117/
> >> >>
> >> >> seems fair
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 17:19:59 +0200
> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Gamestop is offering Xbox One's for R6080. Good luck getting one for
> >> >> under that.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:02 PM, lindsey kiviets
> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> ima get KI,
> >> >>
> >> >> with xbone - Kinect being $400 = R5000 here by us , im definetly
> >> >> getting
> >> >> it.
> >> >>
> >> >> I want a stick though damn , its gna be expensive.
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 12:59:55 +0000
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> The game is free to play, right?
> >> >> I should probably watch some more vids of the game. I’m thinking that
> >> >> the
> >> >> more you play the game, the more you can see the differences in the
> >> >> combos.
> >> >> I haven’t had a good look at the specific differences in the combos for
> >> >> the
> >> >> new KI though.
> >> >>
> >> >> The original ones all had such awesome enders – Jago’s wind kick ender,
> >> >> Fulgore’s teleport ender, Glacius’ puddleport ender…
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >> On Behalf Of Ryan Williams
> >> >> Sent: 26 May 2014 2:56 PM
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >>
> >> >> Unfortunately, I will not be one of them.
> >> >>
> >> >> I've tried really, really hard to like KI. I've watched tournament
> >> >> footage, tried to understand the meta, character options, etc. I can
> >> >> respect
> >> >> what the game has to offer in terms of fighting mechanics and the like,
> >> >> but
> >> >> the complete package just doesn't appeal to me at all. The only
> >> >> character
> >> >> that even remotely appeals to me is Spinal and that really isn't saying
> >> >> much.
> >> >>
> >> >> Even though the gameplay has definitely evolved since release, and
> >> >> there
> >> >> are clear meta strategies being employed during matches, everything
> >> >> still
> >> >> looks so... samey... The animations still look jerky instead of fluid
> >> >> (I
> >> >> understand that everyone will have their own opinions on this; this is
> >> >> simply my perspective) and the combos don't have much variety (even the
> >> >> manuals, which is sad). I'd still play the first one - flawed as it is
> >> >> -
> >> >> over the new one just because of how cool the combos look. There's just
> >> >> this
> >> >> instant appeal and satisfaction when watching/performing combos in KI1.
> >> >> In
> >> >> the new KI, everything just looks really bland and meh. Different
> >> >> strokes
> >> >> for different folks, but that's my 2 cents on the game.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> >> >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> BTW, what are the chances that anyone here will get an Xboxone when it
> >> >> hits SA officially?
> >> >> Just wondering if anyone else will play KI…
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
> >> >> Sent: 26 May 2014 2:38 PM
> >> >>
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >>
> >> >> come play dota2 man.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> you must register your AE on steam anyways.
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:26:29 +0200
> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >> From: euraima@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Nah man, was flying solo so I called it quits. Im back to lol again
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >> >> e-mail
> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >> >> in
> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> >> >> send to
> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >> >> it. If
> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >> >> distribution or
> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
> >> >> prohibited and
> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> >> >> subject
> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
> >> >> of
> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >> >>
> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >> >> error-free,
> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >> >> destroyed,
> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >> >>
> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >> >> services
> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> >> >> Swiss
> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> >> >> independent
> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >> >> services
> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> >> >> distinct and
> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
> >> >> the
> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> >> >> obtained
> >> >> from your KPMG representative.
> >> >>
> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >> >> AntiVirus software.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >> >> e-mail
> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
> >> >> in
> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> >> >> send to
> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> >> >> it. If
> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >> >> distribution or
> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
> >> >> prohibited and
> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> >> >> subject
> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
> >> >> of
> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >> >>
> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >> >> error-free,
> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> >> >> destroyed,
> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >> >>
> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >> >> services
> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> >> >> Swiss
> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> >> >> independent
> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >> >> services
> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> >> >> distinct and
> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
> >> >> the
> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> >> >> obtained
> >> >> from your KPMG representative.
> >> >>
> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> >> >> AntiVirus software.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
> >> Community mailing list.
> >>
> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
> Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
Other related posts:
