Re: USF4 changes!

  • From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 11:48:49 +0200

There's only one thing I more annoying in a discussion than "correlation !=
causation", and that's someone quoting Newton's laws of Thermodynamics.
You'll find this often in the academic field because people are steadfast
in their beliefs.  So when someone says "Hey, I figured out a way to get
energy out of nothing!", the entire scientific community will shun them.
You see, you're not allowed to say "free" energy.  You're supposed to say
"energy from a source that we can't detect directly".  But even then
they'll still point and laugh at you, till you say that stuff like Dark
Matter/Energy has the same properties, and then maybe one or two will
listen to you.


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  It’s not science at fault; it is academia. You’re dealing with people’s
> egos. Makes you wonder how many other nifty discoveries are being ignored.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 01 August 2014 11:33 AM
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> I thought scientists were supposed to be open-minded. A guy builds
> something that could potentially revolutionise space travel and NASA shoots
> it down for years on end because they've got their heads too far up their
> own asses to see any different.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Looks like someone just broke the laws of physics...
>
>
> http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Myself and LB were jamming Karnov's Revenge now on SupArc.  You guys
> think Karnov is bad?  Wait till you meet Jean lol.
>
> J/K Karnov is still stupid and as broken as fuck.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Yo TAP!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  LOL PR Rog is such a troll
> http://www.twitch.tv/pr_balrog/c/3457506
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

Other related posts: