Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:56:16 +0200
I was happy with DR; probably still my fave of the lot. Never was a fan of
BR.
And TTT, despite being a broken POS, was a hell of a lot more fun to play
than DR because good movement could negate most of the BS in it. TTT2 has
better movement than T6 but that's not saying much, i.e. better than T6 but
not better than TTT or DR. I think DR had the best movement after TTT.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> BR was actually pretty bad too...it's very unbalanced, nerfed movement =
> some characters being played like 2D games and winning with 1 move...
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> TTT2 is buggy as all hell. DR and BR were good. Tag2 is not.
>> *From*: Di Lhong [mailto:numotd@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 01:46 PM South Africa Standard Time
>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>>
>> TTT2 IS good :) but solo would be cool too. so we can go back to our
>> mains...
>>
>> now i just have to find my true main...hmmm maybe it's time for Lee.
>>
>> Poor Harada, being swarmed with the same questions by fans lolz.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FU
>>>
>>> TTT2 is good lol
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:27:07 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope it feels like an old Tekken game made for old people like me :/
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 July 2014 13:20, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.gamenguide.com/articles/12175/20140723/tekken-7-release-date-unsure-pc-version-confirmed-jun-kazama.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
