Who's richard ? On 26 Jun 2014 7:44 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yep *lol* > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:49 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> @sap, >> >> does this mean i have to fyt Lumi in USF saturday? >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:29:03 +0200 >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! >> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> Cheers, thanks bro. >> >> See you Saturday. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> We could do it that way. That's definitely an option bro :) Nic and GB >> can just play their USF4 and UMvC3 matches at the next qualifier. So we'll >> proceed as planned. >> >> And thanks :) I'm sure it will :) >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Would it be possible for the rest of us to play our games in the interim? >> I write in three weeks time so I'd prefer not having a clash but at the >> same time I woudn't want to exclude anyone. >> >> On a more serious note, hope everything works out for you dude. Sounds >> like you're making the right decision. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> @Everyone who expressed interest in participating in the qualifiers: >> >> Would you be ok with me starting the qualifiers next Saturday and >> concluding on Evo weekend to accommodate Nic and GB? >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < >> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I just knew something like this would happen >> On 25 Jun 2014 12:04, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> :( >> >> GB is also saying he might not participate due to work stuff :( >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < >> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Working this Saturday :( >> On 25 Jun 2014 11:29, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Thanks bro. I think so too. >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Good luck for the future dude. >> >> I kinda get the feeling that most any other job will be an improvement. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams >> *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:21 AM >> >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! >> >> >> >> Nope, that's still a work in progress. >> >> >> >> I do have a potential job lined up but I also have a financial safety net >> if worse comes to worst. All things considered, I'll be glad to be free of >> this place. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> You managed to find something in the tech writing space? >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams >> *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:14 AM >> >> >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! >> >> >> >> Submitted my resignation today. Happier days ahead, hopefully. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Prometheus would’ve been better if they’d just followed the original >> script. >> >> >> >> @Di – have you seen the original trailer for Aliens 3 – the one that has >> people fighting the Aliens on Earth? Man, that film went through so many >> script changes and director changes. I still like the film. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong >> *Sent:* 24 June 2014 8:30 PM >> >> >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! >> >> >> >> hopefully we'll get to see more of the universe in prometheus 2. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> They kindda explained more about the space jockey...they did however, >> reveal how xeno's started...but still not enough information. In the >> comics, they have ranks, different xeno type, hive system, queen's rite of >> passage and so much behaviour/intelligence. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> The Prometheus series of movies is supposed to explain the origin of >> the Xenomorphs. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I didn't mind Alien 3 that much. Yes, it's not as good as Alien or >> Aliens. But it would be interesting to see Hicks and Newt instead of Ripley >> (or Ripley being in a coma). >> >> >> >> The Queen Facehugger would be interesting to see. But the whole alien >> universe isn't explored much in all the films. All we know in each film is >> they are there, and they are ready to fuck things up. Aliens is the only >> one that really showed us some information about them. Alien 3 showed us >> that it can impregnate other living things...other than that...they're >> still a mystery. While in the comics and games, they have more time and >> space to explore them more. >> >> >> >> I hope they really reboot the series from Alien Resurrection >> onwards...while sticking to the whole futuristic army they did in Aliens. >> Or even a bridge story about how the Coloney fell apart would be cool too. >> Love the series...sadly AVP killed it...AVP 1 wasn't too bad (it's fun to >> watch but not to take super seriously like the original series)...AVP2 was >> abysmal...fuck the brother straus. they promised us futuristic army at >> first, then they thought "what's more scary than aliens in space? aliens in >> your backyard..." and the replace everything with CGI. At least AVP 1 they >> build the 50 feet Queen :D >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Watched 22 Jump Street last night. I liked how it makes fun of itself >> and kinda breaks the fourth wall (lots of quotable material), but then just >> like in the first movie it deteriorates into a steaming pile of double dog >> shit as it approaches the ending. >> >> When I got home I watched Alien and Aliens again back to back. This >> article on Alien 3 told me a lot about the movie I didn't realize (eg. they >> started filming before the script was even complete): >> http://www.tor.com/blogs/2012/06/alien-3-a-haunting-failure >> >> I think I'll watch the Assembly Cut they talk about later tonight. >> >> Oh, Michael Bay has a new series out: >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gZ6bpIjeLs >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >