There are weird Street Fighter 4 noises in his stream Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you! -----Original Message----- From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> Sender: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:10:37 To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: USF4 changes! Arcadia43 in bkk finally have stream: Only USF4 for now. TTT2 in the future. http://www.twitch.tv/xnospower On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @sap did you fap on your boss? > > im happy with another normal session. have to watch orgazmo > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:12:14 +0200 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Thanks man :) > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Ashraf Barendse < > ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm cool with that. > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > *lol* He said he didn't have time to train because of work. > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is he preparing for Soul Calibur 5? lolz > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > :( > > GB is also saying he might not participate due to work stuff :( > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < > nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Working this Saturday :( > On 25 Jun 2014 11:29, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks bro. I think so too. > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Good luck for the future dude. > > I kinda get the feeling that most any other job will be an improvement. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:21 AM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > Nope, that's still a work in progress. > > > > I do have a potential job lined up but I also have a financial safety net > if worse comes to worst. All things considered, I'll be glad to be free of > this place. > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You managed to find something in the tech writing space? > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:14 AM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > Submitted my resignation today. Happier days ahead, hopefully. > > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Prometheus would’ve been better if they’d just followed the original > script. > > > > @Di – have you seen the original trailer for Aliens 3 – the one that has > people fighting the Aliens on Earth? Man, that film went through so many > script changes and director changes. I still like the film. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 24 June 2014 8:30 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > hopefully we'll get to see more of the universe in prometheus 2. > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > They kindda explained more about the space jockey...they did however, > reveal how xeno's started...but still not enough information. In the > comics, they have ranks, different xeno type, hive system, queen's rite of > passage and so much behaviour/intelligence. > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The Prometheus series of movies is supposed to explain the origin of the > Xenomorphs. > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I didn't mind Alien 3 that much. Yes, it's not as good as Alien or > Aliens. But it would be interesting to see Hicks and Newt instead of Ripley > (or Ripley being in a coma). > > > > The Queen Facehugger would be interesting to see. But the whole alien > universe isn't explored much in all the films. All we know in each film is > they are there, and they are ready to fuck things up. Aliens is the only > one that really showed us some information about them. Alien 3 showed us > that it can impregnate other living things...other than that...they're > still a mystery. While in the comics and games, they have more time and > space to explore them more. > > > > I hope they really reboot the series from Alien Resurrection > onwards...while sticking to the whole futuristic army they did in Aliens. > Or even a bridge story about how the Coloney fell apart would be cool too. > Love the series...sadly AVP killed it...AVP 1 wasn't too bad (it's fun to > watch but not to take super seriously like the original series)...AVP2 was > abysmal...fuck the brother straus. they promised us futuristic army at > first, then they thought "what's more scary than aliens in space? aliens in > your backyard..." and the replace everything with CGI. At least AVP 1 they > build the 50 feet Queen :D > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Watched 22 Jump Street last night. I liked how it makes fun of itself > and kinda breaks the fourth wall (lots of quotable material), but then just > like in the first movie it deteriorates into a steaming pile of double dog > shit as it approaches the ending. > > When I got home I watched Alien and Aliens again back to back. This > article on Alien 3 told me a lot about the movie I didn't realize (eg. they > started filming before the script was even complete): > http://www.tor.com/blogs/2012/06/alien-3-a-haunting-failure > > I think I'll watch the Assembly Cut they talk about later tonight. > > Oh, Michael Bay has a new series out: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gZ6bpIjeLs > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > >