Re: USF4 changes!

  • From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:24:35 +0200

@Everyone who expressed interest in participating in the qualifiers:

Would you be ok with me starting the qualifiers next Saturday and
concluding on Evo weekend to accommodate Nic and GB?


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

> I just knew something like this would happen
> On 25 Jun 2014 12:04, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> :(
>>
>> GB is also saying he might not participate due to work stuff :(
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Working this Saturday :(
>>> On 25 Jun 2014 11:29, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks bro. I think so too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Good luck for the future dude.
>>>>>
>>>>> I kinda get the feeling that most any other job will be an improvement.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>> *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:21 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, that's still a work in progress.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I do have a potential job lined up but I also have a financial safety
>>>>> net if worse comes to worst. All things considered, I'll be glad to be 
>>>>> free
>>>>> of this place.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  You managed to find something in the tech writing space?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>> *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:14 AM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Submitted my resignation today. Happier days ahead, hopefully.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Prometheus would’ve been better if they’d just followed the original
>>>>> script.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> @Di – have you seen the original trailer for Aliens 3 – the one that
>>>>> has people fighting the Aliens on Earth? Man, that film went through so
>>>>> many script changes and director changes. I still like the film.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>> *Sent:* 24 June 2014 8:30 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> hopefully we'll get to see more of the universe in prometheus 2.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  They kindda explained more about the space jockey...they did
>>>>> however, reveal how xeno's started...but still not enough information. In
>>>>> the comics, they have ranks, different xeno type, hive system, queen's 
>>>>> rite
>>>>> of passage and so much behaviour/intelligence.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  The Prometheus series of movies is supposed to explain the origin of
>>>>> the Xenomorphs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I didn't mind Alien 3 that much. Yes, it's not as good as Alien or
>>>>> Aliens. But it would be interesting to see Hicks and Newt instead of 
>>>>> Ripley
>>>>> (or Ripley being in a coma).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Queen Facehugger would be interesting to see. But the whole alien
>>>>> universe isn't explored much in all the films. All we know in each film is
>>>>> they are there, and they are ready to fuck things up. Aliens is the only
>>>>> one that really showed us some information about them. Alien 3 showed us
>>>>> that it can impregnate other living things...other than that...they're
>>>>> still a mystery. While in the comics and games, they have more time and
>>>>> space to explore them more.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope they really reboot the series from Alien Resurrection
>>>>> onwards...while sticking to the whole futuristic army they did in Aliens.
>>>>> Or even a bridge story about how the Coloney fell apart would be cool too.
>>>>> Love the series...sadly AVP killed it...AVP 1 wasn't too bad (it's fun to
>>>>> watch but not to take super seriously like the original series)...AVP2 was
>>>>> abysmal...fuck the brother straus. they promised us futuristic army at
>>>>> first, then they thought "what's more scary than aliens in space? aliens 
>>>>> in
>>>>> your backyard..." and the replace everything with CGI. At least AVP 1 they
>>>>> build the 50 feet Queen :D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Watched 22 Jump Street last night.  I liked how it makes fun of
>>>>> itself and kinda breaks the fourth wall (lots of quotable material), but
>>>>> then just like in the first movie it deteriorates into a steaming pile of
>>>>> double dog shit as it approaches the ending.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I got home I watched Alien and Aliens again back to back.  This
>>>>> article on Alien 3 told me a lot about the movie I didn't realize (eg. 
>>>>> they
>>>>> started filming before the script was even complete):
>>>>> http://www.tor.com/blogs/2012/06/alien-3-a-haunting-failure
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I'll watch the Assembly Cut they talk about later tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, Michael Bay has a new series out:
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gZ6bpIjeLs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Other related posts: