Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:23:08 +0200
Ultra Street Fighter IV
Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3
The King of Fighters XIII
BlazBlue: Chrono Phantasma
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:20 AM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I forgot the games we are playing,, tell me Again,, I might have it for PC
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
> *From: * lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sender: * cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Date: *Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:17:59 +0000
> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *ReplyTo: * cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject: *RE: USF4 changes!
>
> are you guys practicing for jhb dudes?
>
> you guys are taking it too easy this is serious stuff.
>
> they might beat us in marvel sf and bb. we need to win at least one of
> these to goto a tie breaker mystery game. then the real skill will come out.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:13:26 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Ok, so you built the meter back during the combo. Nice :)
>
> The only character I can manage similar damage with is Avdol, and it's
> situational.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Vanilla Ice got +/- 650 damage for 4 bars (yes, that's right) and his
> stand for otg.
> Regular stand attacks get him 1 hit on direction change.
> When your opponent is on the floor, you get 2.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Seems a bit like overkill to me. No pun intended.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 19 June 2014 9:13 AM
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> they don't want you to come audit them so they started a coup.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:06:33 +0000
>
> Cool. I’m really beginning to miss playing the fighting games. It’s been
> way too long… I need an extended period back in SA.
>
>
>
> Man, I was supposed to be going to Kenya for a project. I was complaining
> a bit about it because it would’ve meant me being there over the Evo
> weekend. After what’s been happening there over the last week, I don’t
> think I’ll be going there anymore though.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 19 June 2014 9:01 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> I don't think either character has the upper hand. In a 5-5, whoever
> messes up first loses. That's generally how these matches went.
>
>
>
> If a matchup is 6-4 or worse, it's usually very evident.
>
>
>
> Both characters are capable of massive burst damage up close. It really
> comes down to who can land the first hit and maintain pressure from there.
> I'd say it's a 5-5. Maybe I'm wrong and they made it look like a 5-5 when
> it isn't, but it didn't look one-sided to me.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> rpg's are cool man.
>
> I believe in 2012 it was in favour or oni and now in ultra I think its in
> favour of Dudley.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:31:26 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Looks even.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That was an epic set.
> Out if interest, what’s the match-up between Oni and Dud?
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 19 June 2014 8:08 AM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
>
>
> shadow of mordor looks too epic.
>
> new take on arpg's. nemesis system ftw.
>
>
> Sanford vs mug - went in as enemies came out as frienemies
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:55:09 +0000
>
> Watch the whole thing please
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:31:12 +0000
>
> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> i watched 10 seconds and i dont get it.
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:01:59 +0000
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc ,,, there I corrected it,, now
> start laughing guys hahahahaha
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:52:48 +0000
>
> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> broken link is broken
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:47:12 +0000
>
> Anyone that wants to laugh may watch this,, I find it very funny,,
> http://www.youtube.con/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:13:19 +0200
>
> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> I'd get it *lol*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Gutlike!
>
>
>
>
> http://nerdburglars.net/341/Article/this-white-ffvii-branded-ps1-will-make-you-want-to-throw-away-your-money.html
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:43 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmmm,, maybe
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:20:54 +0200
>
> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> Finish him?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Excellent.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Excercised
>
> On 18 Jun 2014 09:07, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ok peeps, it's time to exercise your right to vote yet again :P
>
>
>
> Vote for your preferred scoring format:
> http://www.screator.net/showform.php?f=1193850619
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Yup, been experimenting with that.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You get a really large juggle after the dd+L's 4th hit.
> You can run in jump attack, or qcb+B with a follow up.
>
> On 18 Jun 2014 08:42, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Kewl :) I start the juggle earlier but it gets kinda tricky after that
> and the damage isn't all that great.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yeap.
> Jumping H L, M, H, qcb L cancel, crL, L, M, H, qcb F, cancel, qcb M, crL,
> M, H, dd L, and then some options I'm still gonna check out to see if I can
> make enough meter for a super. Pretty close with 2 options.
>
> Does it involve the launch stuff? :P I'm trying to find something cool but
> practical. It would also help if it was damaging *lol*
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Lol.
> I'm going for variation.
> Too much playing with Mature I suppose.
> I'm going for something waaaay more complicated, lol.
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:52, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I assume that's the GHA version.
>
>
>
> The combo I'm doing is:
>
>
>
> j.H, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx qcb+L~cancel(I end up behind the opponent, then
> cancel)~repeat same combo~cancel, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx d,d+L xx HHA. That
> should net you 558.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My first attempt with a 3 bar Ikuro gets me 551 damage.
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:43, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> *lol* 558 now :P I'll take it!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> *lol* Oh well, managed to squeeze some extra damage out of the combo so
> it's all good. I had a cool juggle variant in mind but it's kinda iffy.
> I'll stick to the grounded version for now. The juggle stuff looks really
> cool though :P
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Erm, scratch that, Ikuro gets health.
> Lol.
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:35, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> True.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You'll get lots more when you hit rage mode.
>
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:32, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting :P
> >
> > Seems my 'decent' combo with Ikuro requires 3 bars, not 2 :( I get 524
> though so it's worth it. Also looks cool.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
