Re: USF4 changes!

  • From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:10:25 +0000

Huhh??? Like the sims?? That would be horrible and it would be complete madness
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:08:25 
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!

Godlike movement comes down to meter management.
One day all fighting games will be the sims.

Fuck new games,bring on the second dark age !


On 12 June 2014 16:06, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Can she? with what? her claw dash is too slow i think or too short..EX
> version is the same as the normal one with extra dash afterwards...so she
> dashes the same distance for the first part then dash again...which doesn't
> help...
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> As much as Injustice was annoying with zoning it aint that bad.  (Supes
>> and bladam was stupid early on till they got patched).
>>
>> Catwoman can probably fullcombo GL after blocked ring grabs from anywhere
>> on screen?
>> ------------------------------
>> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:45:18 +0200
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> Rushdown variation might have armor to deal with zoners? i think so far
>> they're doing pretty well so far...at least the direction they're going.
>>
>> Injustice was pretty messed up...catwomen vs your GL or supes is BS. Once
>> in a blue moon i get up close with GL...he pushes me back to the edge of
>> the screen... -_-"
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Just make walk speed fast. That stops slow gameplay since NRS can't
>> figure out balancing zoners properly.
>>  *From*: Manase Zote [mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent*: Thursday, June 12, 2014 03:25 PM South Africa Standard Time
>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>>
>>  SAP just told me that you need meter to run?
>> Isn't that supposed to be stone age mechanics(having a meter for running)?
>> Who said running was broken?
>>
>> *Sigh*
>>
>> Back in MK3/UMK3/MK4 that meter also managed your combos so no meter
>> no chain combos no running around :(
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Im also not seeing how it can help bad matchups.
>> >
>> > Picking a different version of the same character or a different
>> character
>> > all together between matches would be just like it was now.
>> >
>> > Counterpicking etc.
>> >
>> >> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:11:20 +0200
>> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >>
>> >> How do you get around the rock/paper/scissors character selection?
>> >> Player 1 picks his zoning scorpion while player 2 goes for rush down
>> >> version of scorpion, it will still be a bad match up for one of the
>> >> guys regardless.
>> >> Tools of the characters, match-up exp and lastly the skill level and
>> >> execution will be the deciding factor.
>> >> To me the understanding of a balance fighting is to make every
>> >> character the same...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > Hmmm a good fighting game shouldn't be all about bad match up and
>> lack
>> >> > of
>> >> > knowledge...it should still be fun and challenging in another level
>> when
>> >> > your opponent knows what your character can do.
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes there are bad match ups and character knowledge in fighting
>> games.
>> >> > but
>> >> > it shouldn't be in a state of "i know what you're doing, but i can't
>> >> > retaliate at all"
>> >> >
>> >> > Eg. Tekken. Capos. If my opponent knows how to deal with relax stance
>> >> > and
>> >> > such. I'll play in another mode :) There is no "instant" win in
>> tekken.
>> >> > you
>> >> > can play bears and still win against top tier character because you
>> the
>> >> > player are just better. shouldn't be bringing a plastic ruler to a
>> gun
>> >> > fight
>> >> > situation. should be more or less "experienced fighter with a
>> slightly
>> >> > blunt
>> >> > knife" vs "an okay-ish fighter with a sharp knife".
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This method of balancing looks like a throw of dice to me.
>> >> >> It can go either way, you potentially have a scenario where you can
>> >> >> lose a match based on lack of character knowledge rather than skill.
>> >> >> If the game has like 30 characters for an example multiply that by 3
>> >> >> so on average you need to be aware of what all 90 variations are
>> >> >> capable of?
>> >> >> Let's wait and see what the move list looks like and how many moves
>> >> >> will change between 3 variations of a character.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> > 11.59? XD
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hopefully the character variation will be some answer to really
>> bad
>> >> >> > match
>> >> >> > up. Not sure how they'll balance it tho. It'll be weird to just
>> be a
>> >> >> > total
>> >> >> > counter to another characters variation completely. If that's the
>> >> >> > case,
>> >> >> > it'll be more rock paper scissors situation than a fighting game
>> lolz
>> >> >> > hopefully the variations will make match ups like 9-1 to 6-4 or
>> what
>> >> >> > not. So
>> >> >> > there'll still be unfavourable match ups but not a complete lose
>> like
>> >> >> > MK9...eg. Kabal vs Sheeva...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Williams <
>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I think 12:00 is a safer option Rich :)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Is 11:30 fine also?? I wanna get game time as much as I can
>> >> >> >>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>> >> >> >>> ________________________________
>> >> >> >>> From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >>> Sender: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> >>> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:15:48 +0200
>> >> >> >>> To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >>> ReplyTo: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Heya peeps, we'll be starting the Sat sessions at 12pm to
>> maximise
>> >> >> >>> game
>> >> >> >>> time.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Anyone who is keen on starting a little earlier can join us at
>> that
>> >> >> >>> time.
>> >> >> >>> If you aren't able to make 12pm, that's fine as well.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Ashraf Barendse
>> >> >> >>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> I think she feeling a bit lazy today. She was like "Can I
>> speak to
>> >> >> >>>> the
>> >> >> >>>> main owner of the computer" and I was like "he's at work" and
>> she
>> >> >> >>>> was
>> >> >> >>>> like
>> >> >> >>>> "k thanx bye"
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> >> >> >>>> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> I love those.
>> >> >> >>>>> Start talking linux, usually goes well.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> "move to your start bar"
>> >> >> >>>>> "don't have one"
>> >> >> >>>>> "what version of Windows are you using"
>> >> >> >>>>> "I'm not using Windows"
>> >> >> >>>>> "Open up Internet Explorer"
>> >> >> >>>>> "don't have that either"
>> >> >> >>>>> "open your web browser"
>> >> >> >>>>> "mkay"
>> >> >> >>>>> "install this app"
>> >> >> >>>>> "using my regular tar.z loader or the synaptic package
>> manage?"
>> >> >> >>>>> "huh?"
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> good times.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ashraf Barendse
>> >> >> >>>>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> lol, got a call from an Indian sounding lady calling from
>> >> >> >>>>>> "Windows
>> >> >> >>>>>> Technical Department"
>> >> >> >>>>>> How about no.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ryan Williams
>> >> >> >>>>>> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> "Can I just buy a complete game please?"
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Not going to happen in this day and age. Those days are
>> over.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> >> >> >>>>>>> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> LOL
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I don't know which I hate more about fighting games. The
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> update
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> approach like Street Fighter, or the supposedly new game
>> like
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Blazblue and
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Persona.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> It makes me not want to buy the games anymore, because
>> there
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> will
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> be
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> an Update later.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Can I just buy a complete game please?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Persona now?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Blazblue now?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm just ranting because I see there's a new character
>> coming
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> out
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> for P4A
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> ...and I was planning to get the new Blazblue (english
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> version)...
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> In all honesty, the Capcom approach makes more sense to
>> me, as
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> much
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> as I dislike it.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Wynand-Ben
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> A new dark age starting off with a new Guilty Gear I can
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> definitely
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> live with :D
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:59:23 +0200
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > I'm all for the next FG dark age.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Wreal wrap.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > On 12/06/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > Mortal Kombat Honest Trailer:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCiVYKmCveY
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>> =========================================================================
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
>> Community
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > mailing list.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> =========================================================================
>> >> >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>> >> >> list.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> =========================================================================
>> >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>> list.
>> >>
>> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>> =========================================================================
>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>

Other related posts: