They'll allow it. If the whole point of this 'character variation' is to assist in nullifying bad matchups, then it will probably be accepted. On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Wonder how character variation will work in terms of tournaments though. I > know SBO tournaments is character locked. Eg. Tekken, you choose one > character and stick with it until the end. Be i've seen some tournaments > where you can just change...which is a bit :/ for tekken. Other fighting > games i'm not sure how fair that can be. > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Not sure if they will. I heard from interviews that some normals just >> change completely :/ >> >> We'll see then. >> >> But i like how they're finally thinking of balancing the game for really >> bad match up gameplay at least with character variation. What's the >> outcome, we'll have to just see. No more Kabal instant air fireball zoning >> vs characters who have no answers but take chip damage to death. >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, if they're just altering a few moves, that's fine. If they >>> completely changing the character's frames, we're screwed. >>> *From*: Manase Zote [mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx] >>> *Sent*: Thursday, June 12, 2014 02:43 PM South Africa Standard Time >>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes! >>> >>> >>> This method of balancing looks like a throw of dice to me. >>> It can go either way, you potentially have a scenario where you can >>> lose a match based on lack of character knowledge rather than skill. >>> If the game has like 30 characters for an example multiply that by 3 >>> so on average you need to be aware of what all 90 variations are >>> capable of? >>> Let's wait and see what the move list looks like and how many moves >>> will change between 3 variations of a character. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > 11.59? XD >>> > >>> > Hopefully the character variation will be some answer to really bad >>> match >>> > up. Not sure how they'll balance it tho. It'll be weird to just be a >>> total >>> > counter to another characters variation completely. If that's the case, >>> > it'll be more rock paper scissors situation than a fighting game lolz >>> > hopefully the variations will make match ups like 9-1 to 6-4 or what >>> not. So >>> > there'll still be unfavourable match ups but not a complete lose like >>> > MK9...eg. Kabal vs Sheeva... >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I think 12:00 is a safer option Rich :) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Is 11:30 fine also?? I wanna get game time as much as I can >>> >>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you! >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Sender: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:15:48 +0200 >>> >>> To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> ReplyTo: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes! >>> >>> >>> >>> Heya peeps, we'll be starting the Sat sessions at 12pm to maximise >>> game >>> >>> time. >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone who is keen on starting a little earlier can join us at that >>> time. >>> >>> If you aren't able to make 12pm, that's fine as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Ashraf Barendse >>> >>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I think she feeling a bit lazy today. She was like "Can I speak to >>> the >>> >>>> main owner of the computer" and I was like "he's at work" and she >>> was like >>> >>>> "k thanx bye" >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir >>> >>>> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I love those. >>> >>>>> Start talking linux, usually goes well. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> "move to your start bar" >>> >>>>> "don't have one" >>> >>>>> "what version of Windows are you using" >>> >>>>> "I'm not using Windows" >>> >>>>> "Open up Internet Explorer" >>> >>>>> "don't have that either" >>> >>>>> "open your web browser" >>> >>>>> "mkay" >>> >>>>> "install this app" >>> >>>>> "using my regular tar.z loader or the synaptic package manage?" >>> >>>>> "huh?" >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> good times. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ashraf Barendse >>> >>>>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> lol, got a call from an Indian sounding lady calling from "Windows >>> >>>>>> Technical Department" >>> >>>>>> How about no. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ryan Williams < >>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> "Can I just buy a complete game please?" >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Not going to happen in this day and age. Those days are over. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir >>> >>>>>>> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> LOL >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> I don't know which I hate more about fighting games. The update >>> >>>>>>>> approach like Street Fighter, or the supposedly new game like >>> Blazblue and >>> >>>>>>>> Persona. >>> >>>>>>>> It makes me not want to buy the games anymore, because there >>> will be >>> >>>>>>>> an Update later. >>> >>>>>>>> Can I just buy a complete game please? >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Persona now? >>> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Blazblue now? >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> I'm just ranting because I see there's a new character coming >>> out >>> >>>>>>>> for P4A >>> >>>>>>>> ...and I was planning to get the new Blazblue (english >>> version)... >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> In all honesty, the Capcom approach makes more sense to me, as >>> much >>> >>>>>>>> as I dislike it. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Wynand-Ben >>> >>>>>>>> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> A new dark age starting off with a new Guilty Gear I can >>> definitely >>> >>>>>>>>> live with :D >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:59:23 +0200 >>> >>>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! >>> >>>>>>>>> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>> >>>>>>>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> > I'm all for the next FG dark age. >>> >>>>>>>>> > Wreal wrap. >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> > On 12/06/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> > > Mortal Kombat Honest Trailer: >>> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >>>>>>>>> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCiVYKmCveY >>> >>>>>>>>> > > >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> ========================================================================= >>> >>>>>>>>> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community >>> >>>>>>>>> > mailing list. >>> >>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> ========================================================================= >>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. >>> >>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >> >> >