*Gief not give
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
She can, she has the tools, but they are weaker and will be beaten oftenif not timed correctly.
It's not so much about timing as it has to do with positioning and the
scenario. st.hp has a moving hitbox and it changes her spacing. So does
cr.hp. Jump back normals make her losing screen position. JF Tenko is
very situational. They did this really silly thing with st.hp where the
two hitboxes are active on different frames for only 1f (directly above)
and 3f (somewhat in front of her head) respectively. So sometimes it's
effectiveness just depends on when the opponent presses a button.
For x-ups, she can use jab, but sometimes it trades or loses. She can use
cr.mp, but that depends on the opponent's timing. st.lk works in a
handful of situations. st.lk will work against big bodies like give, but
it only loses if he presses j.hp.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Not in that sense. That decision doesn't really fit any archetype. It's
like trying to make a zoner who can't anti-air.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Isn’t that the point though? Having different characters having
different strengths?
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 26 January 2016 12:23 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
You do realise that weakening that aspect undermines her strengths,
right?
It's like saying you don't need to secure the windows of a house because
it's really hard for a robber to get through the door, or vice versa. The
result is that people are just will just exploit the weakest defense vector.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:05 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
she has strong everything else.
makes sense to nerf her in the AA department.
KAMBO is too clever
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 January 2016 10:01 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
According to Combofiend, Karin was intentionally given weaker anti-airs
to compared to the rest of the cast.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yohohohohohoho!
------------------------------
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 06:38:20 +0000
nash feels heavier than previous beta's.
ken is not cool to play anymore either.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 January 2016 06:35 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I mean early copies,, people sitting with the final game sucks ,, CAPCOM
sure takes the cake for being ass hats
On Jan 26, 2016 12:13 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some people apparently have early copies of SFV.
Ken, Ryu, Nash and Birdie were buffed.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
