Goro can do it in KOF 13 as well.
On 6 Jan 2016 16:49, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For realz??? No more having to hope that it lands? *lol*
Yeah, l didn't know either until l discovered it by accident. You
basically cancel the roll with df+C. With the quick cancel, you can mix up
between command grab and df+C if someone tries to jump away.
On 6 Jan 2016 16:41, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just managed to link Jojo's Star Finger as a true combo.
W, F, Star Finger, Stand Cancel, df+F. It works from near cross-up jump
in F as well.
As for Goro, I didn't know you could df+C "out of" his roll.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Seems like it's unique to 2k2um. The early cancel seems like it could be
difficult to react to and being able to do df+C at any point during the
roll is really cool.
On 6 Jan 2016 15:43, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gonna check in 98. I dig the early cancel :)
On 6 Jan 2016 15:41, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Was added in 2k2um... not sure about 98um, possibly there too.
On 6 Jan 2016 15:36, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@ the KOF heads, could Goro always cancel his command roll early
(before the animation completes)? I noticed you can cancel his roll
earlier
than usual with any of his special moves and his command normal (df+C).
On 6 Jan 2016 14:25, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
then you will always be beaten by randoms.
commitment > safeplay
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 06 January 2016 12:10 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
NO ,, Lindsey,, screw commitment,, play safe ,, I won't commit,, I
will be the best in my own way
On Jan 6, 2016 1:51 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don't you mean if randoms can beat top players, how good is the
game really?
I don't see it happening anyway, not outside top level. My concern
is that top level in SFV is like OK'ish level in other games. That's
what
they were aiming for anyway.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:49 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if you let some random dude beat you then how good are you really?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 06 January 2016 11:48 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
You're describing a party game -_-
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:45 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is like ST with abit more variety with Vag system.
I like the fact that with a little bit of knowledge you can
compete at a moderate level and with understanding your opponent you
could
beat anyone. that's great, imagine randoms beating top players. It
would be
hype levels 9000
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 06 January 2016 11:38 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
How does that even make sense?
The idea of having to play the player instead of the
character/game is interesting in theory, but what does that mean for
a
tournament like EVO? That the probability of beating someone
depends on
how much you've played them online? How many of their YouTube
matches
you've seen?
It feels a bit to me like Super Turbo, where every player in the
top tier has an equal chance of beating each other on the day just
because
of the nature of the game. Except that in ST you need to be really
good at
fundamentals to get to this level. With SFV, you don't need great
execution. You don't need to be that good at beating zoning. You
don't
need that great spacing (in fact, precise spacing is kinda pointless
because of their stupid transition system). Punishment on block can
be
done "in place", instead of having to eyeball how far too move
forward
before punishing etc etc. Close-up offense depends more on reads
that can
go either way rather than forcing situations that are heavily in the
aggressors favour.
This is all just theory fighter though. We'll see what happens
after release date.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Its kinda like an rpg where you level yourself.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 06 January 2016 10:17 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
until you formulate your own strategies to beat certaintendencies that you have encountered in different people.
Which is something I personally think is very stupid...
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:07 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the execution is easy then everyone will be more or less on
the same level regardless of how long you been playing the game,
So every
match would be an uphill struggle until you formulate your own
strategies
to beat certain tendencies that you have encountered in different
people.
Hmm, sf5 is going to be very interesting indeed.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 05 January 2016 08:54 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Meh... I left the videos unlisted because I didn't want them
posted to any sites. Oh well, no biggie.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Aww yeah Sawley, your vid is on the front page of srk
