Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
- From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:51:43 +0000
combo said commitment is the key to be good at sf5.
Please salie , let go, be free and commit
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 06 January 2016 11:49 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I don't think this will be too much of an issue outside top level play anyway.
Good players will find a way to minimize risk. The bad part about that is that
it generally leads to stale gameplay as noone wants to commit.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:47 PM, richard moorcroft
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
No,, that's horrible,, it defeats the point of being skilled at the game,, I
want to become a good player and stay good ,, not some random ass hat beating
me thats underneath my skill level
On Jan 6, 2016 1:45 PM, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
It is like ST with abit more variety with Vag system.
I like the fact that with a little bit of knowledge you can compete at a
moderate level and with understanding your opponent you could beat anyone.
that's great, imagine randoms beating top players. It would be hype levels 9000
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 06 January 2016 11:38 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
How does that even make sense?
The idea of having to play the player instead of the character/game is
interesting in theory, but what does that mean for a tournament like EVO? That
the probability of beating someone depends on how much you've played them
online? How many of their YouTube matches you've seen?
It feels a bit to me like Super Turbo, where every player in the top tier has
an equal chance of beating each other on the day just because of the nature of
the game. Except that in ST you need to be really good at fundamentals to get
to this level. With SFV, you don't need great execution. You don't need to be
that good at beating zoning. You don't need that great spacing (in fact,
precise spacing is kinda pointless because of their stupid transition system).
Punishment on block can be done "in place", instead of having to eyeball how
far too move forward before punishing etc etc. Close-up offense depends more
on reads that can go either way rather than forcing situations that are heavily
in the aggressors favour.
This is all just theory fighter though. We'll see what happens after release
date.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Its kinda like an rpg where you level yourself.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 06 January 2016 10:17 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
until you formulate your own strategies to beat certain tendencies that you
have encountered in different people.
Which is something I personally think is very stupid...
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:07 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
If the execution is easy then everyone will be more or less on the same level
regardless of how long you been playing the game, So every match would be an
uphill struggle until you formulate your own strategies to beat certain
tendencies that you have encountered in different people.
Hmm, sf5 is going to be very interesting indeed.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 05 January 2016 08:54 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Meh... I left the videos unlisted because I didn't want them posted to any
sites. Oh well, no biggie.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Ashraf Barendse
<ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Aww yeah Sawley, your vid is on the front page of srk
Other related posts:
- » SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- lindsey kiviets
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ryan Williams
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- euraima tobias
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- lindsey kiviets
- » RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Wynand-Ben
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- sameegh jardine
- » RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- richard moorcroft
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- sameegh jardine
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- lindsey kiviets
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ryan Williams
- » RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Wynand-Ben
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- lindsey kiviets
- » RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Wynand-Ben
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- lindsey kiviets
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ryan Williams
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- lindsey kiviets
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Wynand-Ben
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- lindsey kiviets
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Wynand-Ben
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- richard moorcroft
- » RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Wynand-Ben
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ryan Williams
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ashraf Barendse
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ryan Williams
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ryan Williams
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Di Lhong
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- » Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits- Ilitirit Sama