I don't think this will be too much of an issue outside top level play
anyway. Good players will find a way to minimize risk. The bad part about
that is that it generally leads to stale gameplay as noone wants to commit.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:47 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No,, that's horrible,, it defeats the point of being skilled at the game,,
I want to become a good player and stay good ,, not some random ass hat
beating me thats underneath my skill level
On Jan 6, 2016 1:45 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is like ST with abit more variety with Vag system.
I like the fact that with a little bit of knowledge you can compete at a
moderate level and with understanding your opponent you could beat anyone.
that's great, imagine randoms beating top players. It would be hype levels
9000
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 06 January 2016 11:38 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
How does that even make sense?
The idea of having to play the player instead of the character/game is
interesting in theory, but what does that mean for a tournament like EVO?
That the probability of beating someone depends on how much you've played
them online? How many of their YouTube matches you've seen?
It feels a bit to me like Super Turbo, where every player in the top tier
has an equal chance of beating each other on the day just because of the
nature of the game. Except that in ST you need to be really good at
fundamentals to get to this level. With SFV, you don't need great
execution. You don't need to be that good at beating zoning. You don't
need that great spacing (in fact, precise spacing is kinda pointless
because of their stupid transition system). Punishment on block can be
done "in place", instead of having to eyeball how far too move forward
before punishing etc etc. Close-up offense depends more on reads that can
go either way rather than forcing situations that are heavily in the
aggressors favour.
This is all just theory fighter though. We'll see what happens after
release date.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Its kinda like an rpg where you level yourself.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 06 January 2016 10:17 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
until you formulate your own strategies to beat certain tendenciesthat you have encountered in different people.
Which is something I personally think is very stupid...
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:07 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If the execution is easy then everyone will be more or less on the same
level regardless of how long you been playing the game, So every match
would be an uphill struggle until you formulate your own strategies to beat
certain tendencies that you have encountered in different people.
Hmm, sf5 is going to be very interesting indeed.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 05 January 2016 08:54 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Meh... I left the videos unlisted because I didn't want them posted to
any sites. Oh well, no biggie.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Aww yeah Sawley, your vid is on the front page of srk
