It's like a bounty on someones head.
On 22 February 2016 at 18:45, richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
wrote:
What is this??? I don't understand
On Feb 22, 2016 6:17 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
So the Iranian media has re issued the fatwa on Salman Rushdie to
commemorate the first one from the eighties.
I don't want to live on this planet anymore 😤
On Monday, 22 February 2016, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:P
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Did she put up a fight?
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 04:15 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
was it love at first sight?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:13 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Interesting,, tell us more
On Feb 22, 2016 4:09 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, it does pay to understand a bit about the footsie game. On the
surface this game has a very diluted footsie game compared to past
iterations but the concepts remain the same, and you need to exploit this
shift the risk/reward into your favour with Ken.
At the most basic level, there are 3 parts of the footsie game:
Aggressive poking (Rock), Defensive poking (Paper) and Baiting/Punishing
(Scissors).
I pointed this out at the session against GB. It looks like he's
playing footsies, but all he's really doing is using one aspect (defensive
poking). In other words, if the opponent didn't move forward, GB's pokes
would never hit. This is because he is poking at a range where the move
will only connect if the player walks forward.
This gives you 3 options to counter:
- Whiff punish (or V-Skill/Skill into throw/normal as the move
recovers)
- Press a higher strength button at the same time (st.hp will cause a
crush counter)
- Walk into that range then jump over the poke (not recommended but
will beat 90% of online players)
Against a competent player, this is where the depth comes from.
They'll set you up by utilizing one aspect of the footsie game then
suddenly change their rhythm.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cheers, I’ll check out the vid when I get home.
For the rest, just practice? Well, I can do that.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 03:18 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Okay, with his TC1 – the b+mp, b+hp, it seems to be a mission toconfirm this puppy. I’ve been reading on SRK and most of the guys there who
were fine with 3rd strike level confirms are okay with it and the rest
are getting screwed.
It's just practice. You need to be able to confirm off single hits in
this game. I don't like that it's such a big part of high level play but
that's just how it is.
Anyways, what’s recommended, the st.LP rather than the d.MP?
Do whatever you find is easier. Chances are if you're losing matches,
it's not because of this combo.
Ken's neutral game at footsie range sucks. You can play him at a bit
further away, but his strength comes from high risk, high reward
maneuvers. Like many other characters who don't have strong normals, Ken
can't really control the flow. So he has to impose his will by making hard
reads and taking risks. You'll find that you will probably have more
success with dashing in and out of range and then making them guess between
crush counter and throw. He becomes much scarier with V-Trigger because he
can use it as an FADC if you make a bad read on an unsafe normal or even
DP.
I don't agree with everything in this vid (up close virtually every
character can do the dash in cr.mp -> confirm), but it has interesting
ideas about his neutral game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GoJpWMNu6w
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lol.
Okay, with his TC1 – the b+mp, b+hp, it seems to be a mission to
confirm this puppy. I’ve been reading on SRK and most of the guys there who
were fine with 3rd strike level confirms are okay with it and the rest
are getting screwed.
After something like a cross-up, max damage is d+mp into TC1, then HK
tatsu (if the opponent wasn’t crouching. If they were it sometimes misses,
so go for HP DP).
But what a lot of people (like Momochi) are doing is st.LP into TC1 so
that it’s easier to confirm the combo, and you also have the option for the
grab instead.
Now, I get that at max range the d+MP into TC1 will whiff anyways, so
this is mainly after a really deep jump in or cross up. Anyways, what’s
recommended, the st.LP rather than the d.MP?
Actually I have a boat load of Ken questions, but I suppose most of
those would be answered more easily if I got off my ass and went to a
session. My main issue, since I’ve only really played against Paas is what
the hell am I supposed to use for a neutral game? At most ranges Karen’s
normal seem to stuff me. I’m fine on anti-airing her. I’m getting to terms
with some of my punishment (even if I don’t do it, I know what it is
supposed to be), but I have no idea how to play against her other than
simply blocking and punishing her and letting her control all the flow of
the game. That is actually enough for me to win games, but it seems like a
really lousy way to play someone like Ken.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 02:34 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I main ken and every other character in sf4, ask away
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 12:30 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Yeah, but is he on the mails?
I’ve got a couple of Ken questions.
*
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 02:25 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Yes,, GB is
On Feb 22, 2016 2:23 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is anyone here playing Ken?
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 02:14 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I am done learning,, you will learn
On Feb 22, 2016 2:08 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Rich u gona lern
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 12:03 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I thought her d+MP was plus on block. Pressing a button after it
doesn’t seem like a good idea.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 02:01 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Why block it??? Press button
On Feb 22, 2016 1:56 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
ya, rmika isn't the safest character.
one thing im not liking is the fact that I must block crmp st mp from
Karin. WTF,
slow ass blockstring. please capcom
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 11:54 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
And both are punishable on block.
Mika is only scary in the corner.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:53 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
random butt splash works and ex butt splash covers ground
rmika is more like makoto tbh. her mid game is not good but her corner
combos hurt a ton.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 11:47 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I backdash to avoid it, although I suppose characters with faster
walkspeeds should have success just walking back. I play Nash exclusively
at the moment so I haven't been able to test this. Yes, neutral jumping is
a means of avoiding it as well, although this is also nothing new compared
to previous SFs (people neutral jumping to punish Bison's scissor kicks at
certain ranges, for example).
I use jabs from range to bait certain things. Recovers fast enough for
you to react to jump-ins, dashes or the aforementioned dropkick.
If her only neutral bypassing tool is charged HK and there are ways
around it, there's very little else that she's going to use to close the
gap apart from dashing in or jumping.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If you position yourself so that it never hits you have to walk
backwards all the time, or you have to neutral jump. Punishing on reaction
is possible but you have to be looking for it and can't be actively poking
defensively to stop her from getting in that range.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I played Mike's R. Mika and every time he used the drop kick, I
positioned myself so that he was never in range to land it or I could
punish it. It's not as much of a threat if you know how to deal with it.
Seems to be the case with most things in this game anyway.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:47 PM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and so?
she dun hav neutral...stuff.
besides she has to charge dat thing so its not like you not seeing it
coming.
Rmike Ross
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 22 February 2016 10:18 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I don't know why you are complaining when you play R.Mika. She just
ignores neutral with her charged drop-kick and then it's an instant 50-50.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:35 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ugh sali is not right, he jump at me too much.
and then when he play nash he run away.
ima formulate a strat for him though.
Ive had good connections against:
- paas
- sali
- khan
- rich
- tazz
I cannot connect to SAP for some reason.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
