I was thinking more along the lines of system flexibility, i.e. what is
possible post-release compared to pre-release.
Would it really make sense to give people early access to the exact same
version of the game they'll be playing on release day? By the time the game
is released, people would have figured out most, if not all tech there is
to discover which would make the release incredibly underwhelming (what
else is there to discover?)
It's not so much about introducing new system features/mechanics but about
restricting what is possible in betas and removing said restrictions
post-release.
On 2 Feb 2016 08:12, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Isn’t the point of the beta to fix issues that you don’t know about –
provide some sort of QA on the stuff? That’s pointless if there is a large
amount of content they didn’t put in.
Sure, it’s possible that they’re hiding extra characters or whatnot, but I
don’t see the point in having a beta if they’re going to have large shifts
in the system. And it is the overall system that people are complaining
about right?
I’m just happy that the game has shifted enough that I might finally be
able to get into it.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 02 February 2016 08:07 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Morning peeps,
After I had a short discussion with SAP surrounding sf5.
I realized something, that in essence two things can happen at launch:
- the game is going to be just like the beta and theres going to be
nothing added
- Capcom will release something resembling sf5 beta but it will
there will be other "stuff" added.
Sap is optimus prime on this one and believes the 2nd scenario will happen
as he sees it as a dumb move on Capcom's part to reveal everything about
sf5 on the beta. I believe Capcom is a dumb company and do make mistakes.
theres nothing else coming, this is it, I hope not , but I think it is.
Thoughts?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 01 February 2016 06:17 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Level of BS
#3. Timestop Timestop
#2. Diavolo dash
#1. Diavolo - F your GHA Jotaro.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Diavolo dash through Hol Horse's super is the best thing ever *lol*
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Re-edited the video to exclude character selects
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Nice :) Watched the Jotaro vs DIO match, l played like such a scrub *lol*.
Will check out the rest of the matches later :)
On 1 Feb 2016 13:04, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Finally got to uploading our matches SAP.
https://youtu.be/oNaPedRiDYc?t=1490
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:00 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So you say the previous games lagged like SHIT or something like this and
people still went and bought it like mad?? Dumb
On Feb 1, 2016 12:56 PM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Naruto Ulitmate Ninja Storm 4
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 02:55:56 -0800
Subject: RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Which naruto game is this??
On Feb 1, 2016 12:46 PM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PC Unfortunately
The previous games ran Like ass on PS3 when stuff got crazy on screen,
not sure if they gonna care about getting it to run smoothly on PS4 or just
gonna push the GFX through the roof instead.
Hopefully this time they dont lock the framerate to 30 on PC... but they
probably not :P
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:37:02 +0200
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
You getting it on PS4 right?
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I dont believe you
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:12:49 +0000
friday?
We care, Paas.
Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Wynand-Ben<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 2016-02-01 11:02
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Anybody else care at all about the Naruto fighting game coming out this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDlW_uJobo>
Ive been enjoying them sofar
________________________________
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 04:24:33 +0000
Sali pls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDlW_uJobo
[https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2BDlW_uJobo/hqdefault.jpg]<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BDlW_uJobo>
3rd strike: Angry_Mad_Jin vs Taiger Salt [Fightcade]<
www.youtube.combehalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
Sent: 31 January 2016 09:11 PMsameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
I'll bring the PS2.
On 31 Jan 2016 23:09, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
Yeah sure at a session sometime.nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Wait? What? Really?
Like co-op and stuff?
On 31 Jan 2016 22:57, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
Count me in, it's been a while since I've played the game.nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
So after fucking about with Shaolin Monks trying to get a ARMax-moddedversion of it to work, I finally came across a 2 sentence long text in a
forum...somewhere... that points out that my "cheap" HD-adapter is to blame
for it not working.
On the plus side, I managed to get the ToxicOS cheat system to work forthe first time ever.
Which means I get to play as all my hack characters again. Who's up forsome Shaolin Monks?
<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:25 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on
lol that anti hype finisher
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 31 January 2016 02:30 PMhttps://youtu.be/Ned-B3VsVBU>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
My experience with SFV in a nutshell.
https://youtu.be/Ned-B3VsVBU
[https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ned-B3VsVBU/hqdefault.jpg]<
attacker's favour. And even if you do get punished, so what? AA's do like
kugame<https://youtu.be/Ned-B3VsVBU>
youtu.be<http://youtu.be>
No footsies. Just jump forever because even if you trade it's in the
no damage. Poke poke x-up times infinity because who's going to stop you?
Notice you even jump back hk loses to j.mk<http://j.mk>. Avoid the x-ups
100 times in the row, then the game decides your Alpha Counter input was
wrong, and the input buffer makes your move come out and you lose.
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
AntiVirus software.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town FightingGame Community mailing list.
//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
