The best is still your Paul..."Sway. Sway"
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:16 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
hahahah lmao , that's accurate
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 24 February 2016 06:14 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:
The one Claudio player here (since he's the only claudio player) would
shout out KOF moves everytime he perform it. Especially Burning Knuckle...
Too funny.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Claudio is full of flash. KOF moves. Flame 'Fap' hand. Sparks flying
during moves. Coat physics blocking view shit. And if you manage to kill
someone with Rage Art...full troll ender (no other rage art looks as good
as his...the off-screen damage is what we call it here...In game 30% dmg,
physical world dmg 1000%)
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I always said Tekken needed more "flash"
On 24 Feb 2016 05:23, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
T7 adding rage arts aka ultra and other flashy stuff makes it fun to
play and watch. Slow Mo is also hilarious (especially when neither players
are KO'd...which is a bit disorientating. But funny as hell to watch).
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah ok.
I think SFV resembling Tekken a bit is more an accident when they
changed the game's system and no push back policy.
Tekken players here in BKK are transitioning into SFV mainly because
it's easier to pick up than SF4. Combos aren't as difficult. Simplifying
the normals so it's pretty much the same close and far also helps. :P
Also,
the announcement of Tekken 7 FR put us all on pause for Tekken because
it's
going to change a lot compare to vanilla T7...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:42 AM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
lol, nah man - a couple of us made the transition to SF4 (most guys
here were probably playing SF before Tekken). For me, I pretty much got
into fighters with Tekken 5 and then eventually got into SF afterward. I
don't think it had to do with wanting a game system that specifically
resembled Tekken. It was more a case of wanting to experience something
different I guess. It's great that more people are giving the series a
bash though. Similarly it'll be nice to see more peeps give Tekken a
chance
once it hits.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It's a similar philosophy to tekken then i guess. Fast Pokes don't
usually have long range. Knd moves or "special" moves are more negative
on
block/punishable.
The removal of push back also puts the two game closer in terms of
playstyle.
From the vids, it's no longer a cr.lk cr.lk fest... light attacks
are merely there to be "fast" (also other uses like anti air etc.) The
removal of far and close also make you utilize your movement more like
tekken.
Let's put it this way, every tekken player here picked up SFV
because they can finally play the game with the similar philosophy. SF4
was
untouched...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
SF traditionally has safe pokes and specials, with the exception of
3rd Strike.
SFIV had less-safe heavy pokes, but they could be used safely
because of the pushback and when the opponent didn't have meter for
super
(just like 3rd Strike). The safety of specials often depended on the
strength you used. Safety of specials was generally inversely
proportional to the strength of the move, with a few exceptions (eg.
Sakura
being + on EX Tatsu).
In SFV heavies and specials are the most unsafe they've been in any
SF game either because of frame data, pushback or both. Pokes also
have
the least range than before.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
To me SFV seems to be closer to Tekken than a 2d game. The frame
system function very similar. (pokes = safe but not always +on block/
knd
and launchers are usually punishable)
Was it always like this in SF4?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:58 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have no idea how you get that much stun,, but I get 640 with
crush counters ,, its all I can get
On Feb 23, 2016 4:31 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I've managed 690 stun with Nash outside of CC. Could be higher
with CC.
On 23 Feb 2016 16:13, "richard moorcroft" <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's a hell of alot,, I can get 625 with Nash atleast
On Feb 23, 2016 4:12 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Most I’ve seen with Ken was in the 750 stun range. Not mine,
off a vid.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 04:10 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Re:
Whats the highest stun combo you guys have uncovered?
On Feb 23, 2016 3:37 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas
Robertson-Muir
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 03:21 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:
Ya, you gotta commit - LB
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh, and I forgot one of the most annoying headaches. Every
time you change a mode, the game sends a status update to the
server. Even
if you just change like a training mode option. That's why you
don't get
battle requests when you pause. This is BEYOND stupid.
So if you're in training mode and you decide you've hand
enough of punching a static dummy, when you change the setting
you miss any
potential match requests because Capcom thinks you're not
available for
matches. That's right, the more effective you are at using
training mode,
the less likely you are to receive a match request.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Ryan Williams <
ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Same here. Give me real-time frame data, for example, and l'm
a happy man. But what there is has proved useful in helping me
understand
how the game functions.
On 23 Feb 2016 15:04, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yup, I still haven’t watched xrd’s anime story thing. Haven’t
bothered to play through with anyone other than Ky. I did play
through all
the previous sf games with each character though. Something to do
when I’m
bored.
Anyways, if they were only concentrating on the pure fighting
game side, there are a few things I’d have liked included in the
training
mode. Also maybe a versus mode that worked alright too.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 02:50 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re:
The casuals got the short end of the stick for sure. I'm not
condoning Capcom's actions at all, but l paid for a fighting
game, which l
happen to play and enjoy, and for that reason alone, it's a
worthwhile
purchase. Story mode, survival, a lack of Arcade mode and all of
the other
trivial garbage is whatever. KOF2002 UM has less by comparison
and l love
the game. GG Xrd has a story mode, Arcade mode and combo
challenges, but I
spent most of my time in training mode.
My reason for purchasing SFV was to play it competitively,
first and foremost. I'm just sad that l can't play against the
majority of
our guys online due to the server issues :(
On 23 Feb 2016 14:35, "Stephen Scheidel" <
gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The fact is that eveyone bought an incomplete game.
Capcom is bodying everyone.
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And I will body you afterwards after you are done with Lindsey
haha
On Feb 23, 2016 12:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I body you 5-0 and then I started getting bored and doing
random stuff to make the game interesting.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:35 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stu just admitted now im not good, meaning Im actually like
the best and now you don't wana admit how good I am.
you not ryt man.
Skill recognizes skill
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <
ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 09:30 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
No I'm saying Capcom forgot how to make games.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:19 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
so u saying r mika is really good?
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
and destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken
in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions
or advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail
and destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken
in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions
or advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.
