FANG is super tall,, like a stretched out human
On Feb 23, 2016 9:47 PM, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I did see Fang have some pushback from some of his normals. Is it due to
his playstyle and height?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's a similar philosophy to tekken then i guess. Fast Pokes don't
usually have long range. Knd moves or "special" moves are more negative on
block/punishable.
The removal of push back also puts the two game closer in terms of
playstyle.
From the vids, it's no longer a cr.lk cr.lk fest... light attacks are
merely there to be "fast" (also other uses like anti air etc.) The removal
of far and close also make you utilize your movement more like tekken.
Let's put it this way, every tekken player here picked up SFV because
they can finally play the game with the similar philosophy. SF4 was
untouched...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
SF traditionally has safe pokes and specials, with the exception of 3rd
Strike.
SFIV had less-safe heavy pokes, but they could be used safely because of
the pushback and when the opponent didn't have meter for super (just like
3rd Strike). The safety of specials often depended on the strength you
used. Safety of specials was generally inversely proportional to the
strength of the move, with a few exceptions (eg. Sakura being + on EX
Tatsu).
In SFV heavies and specials are the most unsafe they've been in any SF
game either because of frame data, pushback or both. Pokes also have the
least range than before.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To me SFV seems to be closer to Tekken than a 2d game. The frame system
function very similar. (pokes = safe but not always +on block/ knd and
launchers are usually punishable)
Was it always like this in SF4?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:58 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have no idea how you get that much stun,, but I get 640 with crush
counters ,, its all I can get
On Feb 23, 2016 4:31 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've managed 690 stun with Nash outside of CC. Could be higher with
CC.
On 23 Feb 2016 16:13, "richard moorcroft" <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's a hell of alot,, I can get 625 with Nash atleast
On Feb 23, 2016 4:12 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Most I’ve seen with Ken was in the 750 stun range. Not mine, off a
vid.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 04:10 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Re:
Whats the highest stun combo you guys have uncovered?
On Feb 23, 2016 3:37 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas
Robertson-Muir
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 03:21 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:
Ya, you gotta commit - LB
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Oh, and I forgot one of the most annoying headaches. Every time
you change a mode, the game sends a status update to the server. Even
if
you just change like a training mode option. That's why you don't get
battle requests when you pause. This is BEYOND stupid.
So if you're in training mode and you decide you've hand enough of
punching a static dummy, when you change the setting you miss any
potential
match requests because Capcom thinks you're not available for matches.
That's right, the more effective you are at using training mode, the
less
likely you are to receive a match request.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Ryan Williams <
ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Same here. Give me real-time frame data, for example, and l'm a
happy man. But what there is has proved useful in helping me
understand how
the game functions.
On 23 Feb 2016 15:04, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yup, I still haven’t watched xrd’s anime story thing. Haven’t
bothered to play through with anyone other than Ky. I did play through
all
the previous sf games with each character though. Something to do when
I’m
bored.
Anyways, if they were only concentrating on the pure fighting game
side, there are a few things I’d have liked included in the training
mode.
Also maybe a versus mode that worked alright too.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 02:50 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re:
The casuals got the short end of the stick for sure. I'm not
condoning Capcom's actions at all, but l paid for a fighting game,
which l
happen to play and enjoy, and for that reason alone, it's a worthwhile
purchase. Story mode, survival, a lack of Arcade mode and all of the
other
trivial garbage is whatever. KOF2002 UM has less by comparison and l
love
the game. GG Xrd has a story mode, Arcade mode and combo challenges,
but I
spent most of my time in training mode.
My reason for purchasing SFV was to play it competitively, first
and foremost. I'm just sad that l can't play against the majority of
our
guys online due to the server issues :(
On 23 Feb 2016 14:35, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The fact is that eveyone bought an incomplete game.
Capcom is bodying everyone.
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And I will body you afterwards after you are done with Lindsey haha
On Feb 23, 2016 12:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I body you 5-0 and then I started getting bored and doing random
stuff to make the game interesting.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:35 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stu just admitted now im not good, meaning Im actually like the
best and now you don't wana admit how good I am.
you not ryt man.
Skill recognizes skill
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 09:30 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
No I'm saying Capcom forgot how to make games.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:19 AM, lindsey kiviets <
lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
so u saying r mika is really good?
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
by AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
by AntiVirus software.
